Cited by 382Atmospheric Ozone and ClimateClimate variability and modelsAtmospheric aerosols and clouds

Radiative forcing and temperature trends from stratospheric ozone changes

Open access
de F. Forster, Piers M., Shine, Keith P.·1997·Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres

Abstract

Detailed shortwave and longwave radiative transfer models are used to calculate the radiative forcing and temperature trends due to stratospheric ozone depletion. These were calculated using the fixed dynamical heating approximation to adjust the stratospheric temperatures. Recent estimates of stratospheric ozone loss between 1979 and 1991 (from solar backscattered ultraviolet (SBUV) and stratospheric aerosol and gas experiment (SAGE) instruments) and updated radiative transfer schemes are used to obtain improved estimates of the radiative forcings. An annually and globally averaged radiative forcing of −0.13±0.02 W m−2 decade−1 (−0.22±0.03 W m−2 for the 1979–1996 period) was found from SBUV total column ozone trends, applying a constant percentage ozone depletion to a 7 km thick layer directly above the tropopause. SAGE ozone trends gave forcing estimates of −0.10±0.02 W m−2 decade−1 (−0.17±0.03 W m−2 for the 1979–1996 period), although assumptions needed to be made about the choice of the vertical profile of the ozone depletion below 17 km. Using Dobson instrument trends from 1964 to 1996, the total ozone forcing could be as negative as −0.26±0.05 W m−2. The quoted error bars derive from uncertainties in the total ozone trends. Using these values, the stratospheric ozone change may have offset about 30% of the forcing due to increases in well‐mixed greenhouse gases since 1979, and about 15% of the forcing since 1964, at least on a global and annual mean. The ozone forcings are shown to be nearly a linear function of the ozone amount depleted from the atmospheric column, provided the vertical profile of the depletion remains constant. As in previous studies, it was found that stratospheric adjustment altered the sign of the ozone forcing by strongly cooling the lower stratosphere. It is shown that (depending on the vertical structure of ozone depletion) coolings of up to 0.4 K decade−1 can be found at altitudes of 35 km; this provides a mechanism for cooling the stratosphere nearly as large as that from well‐mixed greenhouse gas increases, at altitudes where ozone changes were previously thought not to strongly affect stratospheric temperature trends. Previous studies have examined the effect of ozone trends by looking at the response of the surface temperature to a fixed absolute ozone change at different heights in the atmosphere. We argue that using absolute ozone perturbations places an unrealistically large emphasis on ozone changes near the tropopause. As the vertical profile of ozone change is more often reported as a percentage change, we present the sensitivity of the surface temperature to constant percentage, rather than absolute, changes in ozone.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/96jd03510

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Eq. (C.1) fails to some extent for many forcers that are heterogeneously distributed either horizontally or vertically, such as aviation-induced ozone perturbations and contrail cirrus.

    “While Eq. (C.1) is a fairly good approximation for many nearly spatially homogeneously distributed climate forcers, such as global increases of CO2 or CH4, Eq. (C.1) fails to some extent for many forcers that are heterogeneously distributed either horizontally or vertically; such is the case for aviation-induced ozone perturbations and contrail cirrus (e.g., Hansen et al., 1997, 2005; Forster and”

    From The contribution of global aviation to anthropogenic climate forcing for 2000 to 2018 (2021) · cites this paper as Forster and Shine, 1997

  • Eq. (C.1) is a fairly good approximation for many nearly spatially homogeneously distributed climate forcers such as global increases of CO2 or CH4.

    “While Eq. (C.1) is a fairly good approximation for many nearly spatially homogeneously distributed climate forcers, such as global increases of CO2 or CH4, Eq. (C.1) fails to some extent for many forcers that are heterogeneously distributed either horizontally or vertically; such is the case for aviation-induced ozone perturbations and contrail cirrus (e.g., Hansen et al., 1997, 2005; Forster and”

    From The contribution of global aviation to anthropogenic climate forcing for 2000 to 2018 (2021) · cites this paper as Forster and Shine, 1997

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
de F. Forster, P. M., & Shine, K. P.
Affiliations
University of Reading (GB)
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
Published
1997-05
Volume
102
Issue
D9
Pages
10841-10855
ISSN
0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2009292323
Cited by
382
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 10
FWCI
6.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Atmospheric Ozone and Climate
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
Keywords
stratospheric ozone depletion, radiative forcing, stratospheric temperature trends, stratospheric cooling, greenhouse gas forcing, total ozone trends, SBUV, sage, radiative transfer modeling, stratosphere-troposphere coupling, ozone profiles

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review