The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The hydrology and methylmercury dynamics of a Precambrian shield headwater peatland
Open accessAbstract
A hydrobiogeochemical investigation of a small headwater peatland located in the Experimental Lakes Area, northwestern Ontario, Canada, examined the surface and subsurface hydrologic pathways and their relation to the movement and spatial variability of methylmercury (CH 3 Hg+). The hydrology of the peatland controls the mass flux of CH 3 Hg+ to a downstream pond from the terrestrial ecosystems, and influences the production and/or accumulation of CH 3 Hg+ in the peatland. Distinct zones of groundwater recharge and discharge were observed within the peatland, and these corresponded, to low and high CH 3 Hg+ concentrations, respectively, in pore water. The magnitude and flux of CH 3 Hg+ from the peatland was governed by the area of the peatland and surrounding uplands contributing runoff. There was a threefold increase in CH 3 Hg+ concentration as stream base flow passed from the origin of the stream at the hillslope‐peatland margin to the stream outlet at the peatland‐lake interface. This relative increase in concentration was maintained during storm flow conditions even though the discharge was up to 10 times greater, indicating that the peatland is a large source of CH 3 Hg+. Methylmercury‐laden peat pore water found near the surface of the peatland in areas of groundwater discharge moves to the stream as the water table rises to the peat surface. Of a total of 12.6 mg CH 3 Hg+ leaving the peatland during the 112‐day study period, less than 1% was transported directly by groundwater, 41% was transported in stream base flow, and the remaining 58% was transported by storm flow. However, storm flow conditions occurred only 16% of the time, indicating the significance of episodic CH 3 Hg+ flux from headwater catchments on the Precambrian Shield.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Gilmour, C. C., Riedel, G. S., Ederington, M. C., Bell, J. T., Gill, G. A., & Stordal, M. C. (1998) · Biogeochemistry · doi:10.1023/a:1005972708616 · Cited by 470
Benoit, J. M., Gilmour, C. C., & Mason, R. P. (2001) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es001415n · Cited by 301
Lamers, L. P. M., Vile, M. A., Grootjans, A. P., Acreman, M. C., van Diggelen, R., Evans, M. G., Richardson, C. J., Rochefort, L., Kooijman, A. M., Roelofs, J. G. M., et al. (2015) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/brv.12102 · Cited by 257
Mercury in fish, bed sediment, and water from streams across the United States, 1998-2005
Scudder, B. C., Chasar, L. C., Wentz, D. A., Bauch, N. J., Brigham, M. E., Moran, P. W., & Krabbenhoft, D. P. (2009) · Scientific Investigations Report · doi:10.3133/sir20095109 · Cited by 139
Chanasyk, D. S., Whitson, I. R., Mapfumo, E., Burke, J. M., & Prepas, E. E. (2003) · Journal of Environmental Engineering and Science · doi:10.1139/s03-034 · Cited by 51
Metadata
- Authors
- Branfireun, B. A., Heyes, A., & Roulet, N. T.
- Venue
- Water Resources Research
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1996-06
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1785-1794
- ISSN
- 0043-1397 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-7973
- OpenAlex
- W2108272254
- Cited by
- 161
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The hydrology and methylmercury dynamics of a Precambrian shield headwater peatland. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/96wr00790
- The paper
- Branfireun, B. A., Heyes, A., & Roulet, N. T. (1996). The hydrology and methylmercury dynamics of a Precambrian shield headwater peatland. Water Resources Research. https://doi.org/10.1029/96wr00790
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.