Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 237

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Modeling the size distribution of a soil aerosol produced by sandblasting

Open access
Alfaro, Stéphane C., Gaudichet, Annie, Gomes, Laurent, Maillé, Michel·1997·Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres

Abstract

In order to develop a model providing the mass size distribution of the dust raised from the ground by the sandblasting process, mechanical characteristics of 240 μm saltating sand grains meant to be used as projectiles in wind tunnel sandblasting experiments were carefully determined. It was found that for values of the measured friction velocity less than about 55 cm/s, the constraint of the relatively small dimensions of the wind tunnel test section did not prevent saltation from developing freely. The kinetic energy of the sand grains was also determined. Aerosols were then produced in the wind tunnel by bombarding a clay target with the saltating 240 μm quartz grains. The size distributions of these aerosols were measured for three wind speeds with an optical particle analyzer. For the lowest wind speed the size distribution of the aerosol was similar to that of the 8.6 μm aggregates originally constituting the agglomerates of clay, but disaggregation into smaller particles became more important when wind speed increased. A theory of sandblasting was then developed that gave theoretical results agreeing with the experimental ones. A consequence of this theory was that submicron particles could be released from aggregates for high wind speeds. Experiments meant to check this implication were carried out and confirmed it. Cohesion energies of kaolin particles of three different sizes, 8.6, 2.8, and approximately 0.5 μm, were calculated and found to be a decreasing exponential function of the particle size. This explains (1) why the soil‐derived aerosol size distributions present a common mode in the 1–10 μm size range, these particles being readily released even in not particularly energetic conditions, and (2) why observation of a submicron mode in natural aerosols requires a higher friction velocity than for the common 1–10 μm mode.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/97jd00403

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 237

Metadata

Authors
Alfaro, S. C., Gaudichet, A., Gomes, L., & Maillé, M.
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
Published
1997-05
Volume
102
Issue
D10
Pages
11239-11249
ISSN
0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2054997573
Cited by
237
References
0
FWCI
5.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Modeling the size distribution of a soil aerosol produced by sandblasting. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/97jd00403
The paper
Alfaro, S. C., Gaudichet, A., Gomes, L., & Maillé, M. (1997). Modeling the size distribution of a soil aerosol produced by sandblasting. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/97jd00403

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.