The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Modeling the size distribution of a soil aerosol produced by sandblasting
Open accessAbstract
In order to develop a model providing the mass size distribution of the dust raised from the ground by the sandblasting process, mechanical characteristics of 240 μm saltating sand grains meant to be used as projectiles in wind tunnel sandblasting experiments were carefully determined. It was found that for values of the measured friction velocity less than about 55 cm/s, the constraint of the relatively small dimensions of the wind tunnel test section did not prevent saltation from developing freely. The kinetic energy of the sand grains was also determined. Aerosols were then produced in the wind tunnel by bombarding a clay target with the saltating 240 μm quartz grains. The size distributions of these aerosols were measured for three wind speeds with an optical particle analyzer. For the lowest wind speed the size distribution of the aerosol was similar to that of the 8.6 μm aggregates originally constituting the agglomerates of clay, but disaggregation into smaller particles became more important when wind speed increased. A theory of sandblasting was then developed that gave theoretical results agreeing with the experimental ones. A consequence of this theory was that submicron particles could be released from aggregates for high wind speeds. Experiments meant to check this implication were carried out and confirmed it. Cohesion energies of kaolin particles of three different sizes, 8.6, 2.8, and approximately 0.5 μm, were calculated and found to be a decreasing exponential function of the particle size. This explains (1) why the soil‐derived aerosol size distributions present a common mode in the 1–10 μm size range, these particles being readily released even in not particularly energetic conditions, and (2) why observation of a submicron mode in natural aerosols requires a higher friction velocity than for the common 1–10 μm mode.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The physics of wind-blown sand and dust
Kok, J. F., Parteli, E. J. R., Michaels, T. I., & Karam, D. B. (2012) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/75/10/106901 · Cited by 1,608
Atmospheric global dust cycle and iron inputs to the ocean
Mahowald, N. M., Baker, A. R., Bergametti, G., Brooks, N., Duce, R. A., Jickells, T. D., Kubilay, N., Prospero, J. M., & Tegen, I. (2005) · Global Biogeochemical Cycles · doi:10.1029/2004gb002402 · Cited by 1,236
Sokolik, I. N., & Toon, O. B. (1999) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/1998jd200048 · Cited by 939
Metadata
- Authors
- Alfaro, S. C., Gaudichet, A., Gomes, L., & Maillé, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1997-05
- Volume
- 102
- Issue
- D10
- Pages
- 11239-11249
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2054997573
- Cited by
- 237
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Modeling the size distribution of a soil aerosol produced by sandblasting. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/97jd00403
- The paper
- Alfaro, S. C., Gaudichet, A., Gomes, L., & Maillé, M. (1997). Modeling the size distribution of a soil aerosol produced by sandblasting. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/97jd00403
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.