Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 236

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Equatorial scintillation and systems support

Open access
Groves, K. M., Basu, S., Weber, E. J., Smitham, M., Kuenzler, H., Valladares, C. E., Sheehan, R., MacKenzie, E., Secan, J. A., Ning, P., McNeill, W. J., Moonan, D. W., Kendra, M. J.·1997·Radio Science

Abstract

The need to nowcast and forecast scintillation for the support of operational systems has been recently identified by the interagency National Space Weather Program. This issue is addressed in the present paper in the context of nighttime irregularities in the equatorial ionosphere that cause intense amplitude and phase scintillations of satellite signals in the VHF/UHF range of frequencies and impact satellite communication, Global Positioning System navigation, and radar systems. Multistation and multifrequency satellite scintillation observations have been used to show that even though equatorial scintillations vary in accordance with the solar cycle, the extreme day‐to‐day variability of unknown origin modulates the scintillation occurrence during all phases of the solar cycle. It is shown that although equatorial scintillation events often show correlation with magnetic activity, the major component of scintillation is observed during magnetically quiet periods. In view of the day‐to‐day variability of the occurrence and intensity of scintillating regions, their latitude extent, and their zonal motion, a regional specification and short‐term forecast system based on real‐time measurements has been developed. This system, named the Scintillation Network Decision Aid, consists of two latitudinally dispersed stations, each of which uses spaced antenna scintillation receiving systems to monitor 250‐MHz transmissions from two longitudinally separated geostationary satellites. The scintillation index and zonal irregularity drift are processed on‐line and are retrieved by a remote operator on the Internet. At the operator terminal the data are combined with an empirical plasma bubble model to generate three‐dimensional maps of irregularity structures and two‐dimensional outage maps for the region.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/97rs00836

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 236

Metadata

Authors
Groves, K. M., Basu, S., Weber, E. J., Smitham, M., Kuenzler, H., Valladares, C. E., Sheehan, R., MacKenzie, E., Secan, J. A., Ning, P., McNeill, W. J., Moonan, D. W., & Kendra, M. J.
Venue
Radio Science
Published
1997-09
Volume
32
Issue
5
Pages
2047-2064
ISSN
  • 0048-6604 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-799X
OpenAlex
W1978982466
Cited by
236
References
0
FWCI
1.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Equatorial scintillation and systems support. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/97rs00836
The paper
Groves, K. M., Basu, S., Weber, E. J., Smitham, M., Kuenzler, H., Valladares, C. E., Sheehan, R., MacKenzie, E., Secan, J. A., Ning, P., McNeill, W. J., Moonan, D. W., & Kendra, M. J. (1997). Equatorial scintillation and systems support. Radio Science. https://doi.org/10.1029/97rs00836

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.