The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Seasonal patterns in streamwater nutrient and dissolved organic carbon concentrations: Separating catchment flow path and in‐stream effects
Abstract
Distinct seasonal patterns in streamwater nutrient and dissolved organic carbon (DOC) concentrations are evident in the data record from 7 years of weekly sampling in the West Fork of Walker Branch (WB) and 4 years of weekly sampling in a nearby stream, upper White Oak Creek (WOC), both first‐order streams in the Ridge and Valley Province of eastern Tennessee. Concentrations of NO 3 and soluble reactive phosphorus (SRP) in both streams showed a repeated pattern of annual maxima in summer and biannual minima in autumn and spring. Concentrations of DOC in WB exhibited distinct autumn maxima. To determine whether temporal variations in catchment hydrological processes could explain the seasonal nutrient and DOC variations in WB, we used an end‐member mixing analysis involving Ca and SO 4 concentrations to separate stream discharge into three catchment flow paths of differing nutrient concentrations. Stream NO 3, SRP, and DOC concentrations were predicted solely on the basis of temporal variation in the importance of these flow paths and measurements of nutrient concentrations for the different flow paths. Ratios of observed/predicted concentrations in stream water near 1.0 suggested that catchment effects alone explained streamwater concentrations, whereas ratios substantially different from 1.0 suggested that in‐stream processes were important determinants of streamwater concentrations. Observed/predicted NO 3 and SRP concentration ratios showed repeated annual patterns with values closer to 1.0 during winter and summer (generally 0.8–1.2) and minima (<0.6) in spring and autumn, suggesting substantial in‐stream net uptake at these times. Observed/predicted DOC concentration ratios were more variable and generally ≥1 but did show consistent autumn maxima (>2.5), indicating substantial in‐stream DOC generation at this time. Observed/predicted ratios for all nutrients were generally less variable and were closer to 1.0 at high flow compared to low flow, suggesting that in‐stream controls on streamwater chemistry are less important at high discharge than at low discharge. Our results indicate two general modes of control of stream nutrient concentrations: (1) catchment control via seasonal variation in the dominant hydrologic pathway (greater proportion of deep groundwater in summer), which produces lower winter and higher summer concentrations, and (2) in‐stream control via high rates of net nutrient uptake during the spring (primarily by autotrophs) and autumn (primarily by heterotrophs).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater
Jenkins, S. H. (1982) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/0043-1354(82)90249-4 · Cited by 30,002
Nitrogen Saturation in Northern Forest Ecosystems
Aber, J. D., Nadelhoffer, K. J., Steudler, P., & Melillo, J. M. (1989) · BioScience · doi:10.2307/1311067 · Cited by 2,373
Biogeochemistry of a forested ecosystem
(2014) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.51-6175 · Cited by 1,550
Biogeochemistry of a Forested Ecosystem
Likens, G. E., Bormann, F. H., Pierce, R. S., Eaton, J. S., & Johnson, N. M. (1977) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-9993-7 · Cited by 934
Hooper, R. P., Christophersen, N., & Peters, N. E. (1990) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/0022-1694(90)90131-g · Cited by 551
Hornberger, G. M., Bencala, K. E., & McKnight, D. M. (1994) · Biogeochemistry · doi:10.1007/bf00024390 · Cited by 519
Elwood, J. W., Newbold, J. D., Trimble, A. F., & Stark, R. W. (1981) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1936678 · Cited by 446
Light Limitation in a Stream Ecosystem: Responses by Primary Producers and Consumers
Hill, W. R., Ryon, M. G., & Schilling, E. M. (1995) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1940936 · Cited by 422
Self-citationThe effects of geology and land use on the export of phosphorus from watersheds
Dillon, P. J., & Kirchner, W. B. (1975) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/0043-1354(75)90002-0 · Cited by 404
Phosphorus Dynamics in a Woodland Stream Ecosystem: A Study of Nutrient Spiralling
Newbold, J. D., Elwood, J. W., O'Neill, R. V., & Sheldon, A. L. (1983) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1937833 · Cited by 377
Cited by
Hot Spots and Hot Moments in Riparian Zones: Potential for Improved Water Quality Management1
Vidon, P., Allan, C., Burns, D., Duval, T. P., Gurwick, N., Inamdar, S., Lowrance, R., Okay, J., Scott, D., & Sebestyen, S. (2010) · JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association · doi:10.1111/j.1752-1688.2010.00420.x · Cited by 508
Transit times—the link between hydrology and water quality at the catchment scale
Hrachowitz, M., Benettin, P., van Breukelen, B. M., Fovet, O., Howden, N. J. K., Ruiz, L., van der Velde, Y., & Wade, A. J. (2016) · WIREs Water · doi:10.1002/wat2.1155 · Cited by 346
Sherson, L. R., Van Horn, D. J., Gomez-Velez, J. D., Crossey, L. J., & Dahm, C. N. (2015) · Hydrological Processes · doi:10.1002/hyp.10426 · Cited by 81
Jung, H. Y., Hogue, T. S., Rademacher, L. K., & Meixner, T. (2009) · Hydrological Processes · doi:10.1002/hyp.7132 · Cited by 57
Metadata
- Authors
- Mulholland, P. J., & Hill, W. R.
- Venue
- Water Resources Research
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1997-06
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1297-1306
- ISSN
- 0043-1397 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-7973
- OpenAlex
- W1995291155
- Cited by
- 277
- References
- 38
- FWCI
- 6.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Seasonal patterns in streamwater nutrient and dissolved organic carbon concentrations: Separating catchment flow path and in‐stream effects. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/97wr00490
- The paper
- Mulholland, P. J., & Hill, W. R. (1997). Seasonal patterns in streamwater nutrient and dissolved organic carbon concentrations: Separating catchment flow path and in‐stream effects. Water Resources Research. https://doi.org/10.1029/97wr00490
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.