The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Phosphorus Dynamics in a Woodland Stream Ecosystem: A Study of Nutrient Spiralling
Abstract
The term spiralling refers to the interdependent processes of cycling and downstream transport of nutrients in a stream ecosystem. To describe spiralling in Walker Branch, a first—order woodland stream in Tennessee, we released 32 PO 4 to the stream water and measured its uptake from the water and then followed its dynamics in coarse particulate organic matter (CPOM), fine particulate organic matter (FPOM), aufwuchs, grazers, shredders, collectors, net—spinning filter feeders, and predators over a 6—wk period. Rates of transfer among compartments and rates of downstream transport were estimated by fitting a partial differential equation model of the ecosystem to the data. With the resulting coefficients, the model was run to steady state to estimate standing stocks and fluxes of exchangeable phosphorus. Phosphorus moved downstream at an average velocity of 10.4 m/d, cycling once every 18.4 d. The average downstream distance associated with one cycle, defined as the spiralling length, was therefore 190 m (10.4 m/d ° d). Spiralling length, at steady state, is approximately the ratio of the total downstream flux of phosphorus per unit width of stream (720 mg°d—1°m—1) to the rate of P uptake from the water (3.90 mg°m—2.d—1). CPOM accounted for 60% of the uptake, FPOM for 35%, and aufwuchs for 5%. Turnover times of P in particulates ranged from 5.6 to 6.7, except for FPOM, which showed a second, slower turnover time of 99 d. Of the P uptake from water by particulates, 2.8% was transferred to consumers, while the remainder returned directly to the water. About 30% of the consumer uptake, in turn, was transferred to predators. The spiralling length was partitioned into: (1) an uptake length associated with transport in the water column (165 m), (2) a particulate turnover length associated with transport in FPOM and CPOM (25 m), and (3) a consumer turnover length associated with animal drift (0.05 m). FPOM transport accounted for 99% of the particulate turnover length. The small consumer turnover length reflected low consumer uptake of P from particulates and slow downstream drift velocity (0.013 m/d). In spite of the low rate of phosphorus uptake, the combined consumer—and—predator community accounted for 25% of the standing stock of exchangeable P in the stream. The retentiveness of this community is attributable both to the low drift rate and to a long turnover time (152 d) for P within the community.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A modified single solution method for the determination of phosphate in natural waters
Murphy, J., & Riley, J. P. (1962) · Analytica Chimica Acta · doi:10.1016/s0003-2670(00)88444-5 · Cited by 21,093
Fluvial Processes in Geomorphology
Ahnert, F., Leopold, L. B., Wolman, M. G., & Miller, J. P. (1965) · Geographical Review · doi:10.2307/213147 · Cited by 2,418
Measuring Nutrient Spiralling in Streams
Newbold, J. D., Elwood, J. W., O'Neill, R. V., & Winkle, W. V. (1981) · Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences · doi:10.1139/f81-114 · Cited by 709
Self-citationEffects of Watershed Perturbation on Stream Potassium and Calcium Dynamics
Webster, J. R., & Patten, B. C. (1979) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.2307/1942572 · Cited by 372
Transport and Transformation of Phosphorus in a Forest Stream Ecosystem
Meyer, J. L., & Likens, G. E. (1979) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1936971 · Cited by 312
Nutrient Spiralling in Streams: Implications for Nutrient Limitation and Invertebrate Activity
Newbold, J. D., O'Neill, R. V., Elwood, J. W., & Van Winkle, W. (1982) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/284017 · Cited by 261
Self-citationOrganic Carbon Spiralling in Stream Ecosystems
Newbold, J. D., Mulholland, P. J., Elwood, J. W., & O'Neill, R. V. (1982) · Oikos · doi:10.2307/3544663 · Cited by 203
Self-citationEffect of a Current on Respiration and Mineral Uptake In Spirogyra and Oedogonium
Whitford, L. A., & Schumacher, G. J. (1964) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1937120 · Cited by 118
Dynamics of Phosphorus and Organic Matter during Leaf Decomposition in a Forest Stream
Meyer, J. L. (1980) · Oikos · doi:10.2307/3544548 · Cited by 99
Chamberlain, W., & Shapiro, J. (1969) · Limnology and Oceanography · doi:10.4319/lo.1969.14.6.0921 · Cited by 81
Cited by
Kadlec, R. H., & Wallace, S. (2008) · doi:10.1201/9781420012514 · Cited by 1,009
Covino, T. (2017) · Geomorphology · doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2016.09.030 · Cited by 328
Mulholland, P. J., & Hill, W. R. (1997) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1029/97wr00490 · Cited by 277
How to Avoid Train Wrecks When Using Science in Environmental Problem Solving
BENDA, L. E., POFF, N. L., TAGUE, C., PALMER, M. A., PIZZUTO, J., COOPER, S., STANLEY, E., & MOGLEN, G. (2002) · BioScience · doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052[1127:htatww]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 133
Metadata
- Authors
- Newbold, J. D., Elwood, J. W., O'Neill, R. V., & Sheldon, A. L.
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1983-10
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1249-1265
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-9170
- OpenAlex
- W1963790769
- Cited by
- 377
- References
- 12
- FWCI
- 5.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phosphorus Dynamics in a Woodland Stream Ecosystem: A Study of Nutrient Spiralling. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1937833
- The paper
- Newbold, J. D., Elwood, J. W., O'Neill, R. V., & Sheldon, A. L. (1983). Phosphorus Dynamics in a Woodland Stream Ecosystem: A Study of Nutrient Spiralling. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1937833
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.