Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 377

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Phosphorus Dynamics in a Woodland Stream Ecosystem: A Study of Nutrient Spiralling

Newbold, J. D., Elwood, J. W., O'Neill, R. V., Sheldon, A. L.·1983·Ecology

Abstract

The term spiralling refers to the interdependent processes of cycling and downstream transport of nutrients in a stream ecosystem. To describe spiralling in Walker Branch, a first—order woodland stream in Tennessee, we released 32 PO 4 to the stream water and measured its uptake from the water and then followed its dynamics in coarse particulate organic matter (CPOM), fine particulate organic matter (FPOM), aufwuchs, grazers, shredders, collectors, net—spinning filter feeders, and predators over a 6—wk period. Rates of transfer among compartments and rates of downstream transport were estimated by fitting a partial differential equation model of the ecosystem to the data. With the resulting coefficients, the model was run to steady state to estimate standing stocks and fluxes of exchangeable phosphorus. Phosphorus moved downstream at an average velocity of 10.4 m/d, cycling once every 18.4 d. The average downstream distance associated with one cycle, defined as the spiralling length, was therefore 190 m (10.4 m/d ° d). Spiralling length, at steady state, is approximately the ratio of the total downstream flux of phosphorus per unit width of stream (720 mg°d—1°m—1) to the rate of P uptake from the water (3.90 mg°m—2.d—1). CPOM accounted for 60% of the uptake, FPOM for 35%, and aufwuchs for 5%. Turnover times of P in particulates ranged from 5.6 to 6.7, except for FPOM, which showed a second, slower turnover time of 99 d. Of the P uptake from water by particulates, 2.8% was transferred to consumers, while the remainder returned directly to the water. About 30% of the consumer uptake, in turn, was transferred to predators. The spiralling length was partitioned into: (1) an uptake length associated with transport in the water column (165 m), (2) a particulate turnover length associated with transport in FPOM and CPOM (25 m), and (3) a consumer turnover length associated with animal drift (0.05 m). FPOM transport accounted for 99% of the particulate turnover length. The small consumer turnover length reflected low consumer uptake of P from particulates and slow downstream drift velocity (0.013 m/d). In spite of the low rate of phosphorus uptake, the combined consumer—and—predator community accounted for 25% of the standing stock of exchangeable P in the stream. The retentiveness of this community is attributable both to the low drift rate and to a long turnover time (152 d) for P within the community.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1937833

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 12 references

Cited by

See all 377

Metadata

Authors
Newbold, J. D., Elwood, J. W., O'Neill, R. V., & Sheldon, A. L.
Venue
Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1983-10
Volume
64
Issue
5
Pages
1249-1265
ISSN
  • 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-9170
OpenAlex
W1963790769
Cited by
377
References
12
FWCI
5.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phosphorus Dynamics in a Woodland Stream Ecosystem: A Study of Nutrient Spiralling. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1937833
The paper
Newbold, J. D., Elwood, J. W., O'Neill, R. V., & Sheldon, A. L. (1983). Phosphorus Dynamics in a Woodland Stream Ecosystem: A Study of Nutrient Spiralling. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1937833

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.