The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Regional interpretation of water‐quality monitoring data
Open accessAbstract
We describe a method for using spatially referenced regressions of contaminant transport on watershed attributes (SPARROW) in regional water‐quality assessment. The method is designed to reduce the problems of data interpretation caused by sparse sampling, network bias, and basin heterogeneity. The regression equation relates measured transport rates in streams to spatially referenced descriptors of pollution sources and land‐surface and stream‐channel characteristics. Regression models of total phosphorus (TP) and total nitrogen (TN) transport are constructed for a region defined as the nontidal conterminous United States. Observed TN and TP transport rates are derived from water‐quality records for 414 stations in the National Stream Quality Accounting Network. Nutrient sources identified in the equations include point sources, applied fertilizer, livestock waste, nonagricultural land, and atmospheric deposition (TN only). Surface characteristics found to be significant predictors of land‐water delivery include soil permeability, stream density, and temperature (TN only). Estimated instream decay coefficients for the two contaminants decrease monotonically with increasing stream size. TP transport is found to be significantly reduced by reservoir retention. Spatial referencing of basin attributes in relation to the stream channel network greatly increases their statistical significance and model accuracy. The method is used to estimate the proportion of watersheds in the conterminous United States (i.e., hydrologic cataloging units) with outflow TP concentrations less than the criterion of 0.1 mg/L, and to classify cataloging units according to local TN yield (kg/km 2/yr).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Jackknife, the Bootstrap and Other Resampling Plans
Efron, B. (1982) · Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics eBooks · doi:10.1137/1.9781611970319 · Cited by 8,120
Cited by
Gassman, P. W., Reyes, M. R., Green, C. H., & Arnold, J. G. (2007) · Transactions of the ASABE · doi:10.13031/2013.23637 · Cited by 3,040
Denitrification across landscapes and waterscapes: a synthesis
Seitzinger, S., Harrison, J. A., Böhlke, J. K., Bouwman, A. F., Lowrance, R., Peterson, B., Tobias, C., & Drecht, G. V. (2006) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/1051-0761(2006)016[2064:dalawa]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 1,679
Effect of stream channel size on the delivery of nitrogen to the Gulf of Mexico
Alexander, R. B., Smith, R. A., & Schwarz, G. E. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35001562 · Cited by 1,121
Self-citationAn integrated methodology for assessment of estuarine trophic status
Bricker, S. B., Ferreira, J. G., & Simas, T. (2003) · Ecological Modelling · doi:10.1016/s0304-3800(03)00199-6 · Cited by 513
Nitrogen Use in the United States from 1961–2000 and Potential Future Trends
Howarth, R. W., Boyer, E. W., Pabich, W. J., & Galloway, J. N. (2002) · AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment · doi:10.1579/0044-7447-31.2.88 · Cited by 438
Metadata
- Authors
- Smith, R. A., Schwarz, G. E., & Alexander, R. B.
- Venue
- Water Resources Research
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1997-12
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2781-2798
- ISSN
- 0043-1397 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-7973
- OpenAlex
- W2132082910
- Cited by
- 679
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Regional interpretation of water‐quality monitoring data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/97wr02171
- The paper
- Smith, R. A., Schwarz, G. E., & Alexander, R. B. (1997). Regional interpretation of water‐quality monitoring data. Water Resources Research. https://doi.org/10.1029/97wr02171
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.