Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 229

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Spatial structure of the solar wind and comparisons with solar data and models

Open access
Neugebauer, M., Forsyth, R. J., Galvin, A. B., Harvey, K. L., Hoeksema, J. T., Lazarus, A. J., Lepping, R. P., Linker, J. A., Mikic, Z., Steinberg, J. T., von Steiger, R., Wang, Y.‐M., Wimmer‐Schweingruber, R. F.·1998·Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics

Abstract

Data obtained by instruments on the Ulysses spacecraft during its rapid sweep through >90° of solar latitude, crossing the solar equator in early 1995, were combined with data obtained near Earth by the Wind spacecraft to study the spatial structure of the solar wind and to compare to different models of the interplanetary magnetic field derived from solar observations. Several different source‐surface models matched the double sinusoidal structure of the heliospheric current sheet (HCS) but with differences in latitude as great as 21°. The source‐surface model that included an interplanetary current sheet gave poorer agreement with observed current‐sheet crossings during this period than did the other source‐surface models or an MHD model. The differences between the calculated and observed locations of the HCS were minimized when 22° of solar rotation was added to the constant‐velocity travel time from the source surface to the spacecraft. The photospheric footpoints of the open field lines calculated from the models generally agreed with observations in the He 10,830 Å line of the locations of coronal holes with the exceptions that (1) in some places, open field lines originated outside the coronal hole boundaries and (2) the models show apparently closed‐field regions just inside some coronal hole boundaries. The patterns of mismatches between coronal hole boundaries and the envelopes of open field lines persisted over at least three solar rotations. The highest‐speed wind came from the polar coronal holes, with the wind originating deeper within the hole being faster than the wind coming from near the hole boundary. Intermediate and slow streams originated in smaller coronal holes at low latitudes and from open field regions just outside coronal hole boundaries. Although the HCS threaded regions of low speed, low helium abundance, high ionization temperature, and a high ratio of magnesium to oxygen densities (a surplus of an element with low first‐ionization potential), there was a great deal of variation in these parameters from one place to another along the HCS. The gradient of speed with latitude varied from 14 to 28 km s−1 deg−1.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/98ja00798

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 229

Metadata

Authors
Neugebauer, M., Forsyth, R. J., Galvin, A. B., Harvey, K. L., Hoeksema, J. T., Lazarus, A. J., Lepping, R. P., Linker, J. A., Mikic, Z., Steinberg, J. T., von Steiger, R., Wang, Y. ‐., & Wimmer‐Schweingruber, R. F.
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics
Published
1998-07
Volume
103
Issue
A7
Pages
14587-14599
ISSN
0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2071154966
Cited by
229
References
0
FWCI
9.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Spatial structure of the solar wind and comparisons with solar data and models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/98ja00798
The paper
Neugebauer, M., Forsyth, R. J., Galvin, A. B., Harvey, K. L., Hoeksema, J. T., Lazarus, A. J., Lepping, R. P., Linker, J. A., Mikic, Z., Steinberg, J. T., von Steiger, R., Wang, Y. ‐., & Wimmer‐Schweingruber, R. F. (1998). Spatial structure of the solar wind and comparisons with solar data and models. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics. https://doi.org/10.1029/98ja00798

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.