The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Spatial structure of the solar wind and comparisons with solar data and models
Open accessAbstract
Data obtained by instruments on the Ulysses spacecraft during its rapid sweep through >90° of solar latitude, crossing the solar equator in early 1995, were combined with data obtained near Earth by the Wind spacecraft to study the spatial structure of the solar wind and to compare to different models of the interplanetary magnetic field derived from solar observations. Several different source‐surface models matched the double sinusoidal structure of the heliospheric current sheet (HCS) but with differences in latitude as great as 21°. The source‐surface model that included an interplanetary current sheet gave poorer agreement with observed current‐sheet crossings during this period than did the other source‐surface models or an MHD model. The differences between the calculated and observed locations of the HCS were minimized when 22° of solar rotation was added to the constant‐velocity travel time from the source surface to the spacecraft. The photospheric footpoints of the open field lines calculated from the models generally agreed with observations in the He 10,830 Å line of the locations of coronal holes with the exceptions that (1) in some places, open field lines originated outside the coronal hole boundaries and (2) the models show apparently closed‐field regions just inside some coronal hole boundaries. The patterns of mismatches between coronal hole boundaries and the envelopes of open field lines persisted over at least three solar rotations. The highest‐speed wind came from the polar coronal holes, with the wind originating deeper within the hole being faster than the wind coming from near the hole boundary. Intermediate and slow streams originated in smaller coronal holes at low latitudes and from open field regions just outside coronal hole boundaries. Although the HCS threaded regions of low speed, low helium abundance, high ionization temperature, and a high ratio of magnesium to oxygen densities (a surplus of an element with low first‐ionization potential), there was a great deal of variation in these parameters from one place to another along the HCS. The gradient of speed with latitude varied from 14 to 28 km s−1 deg−1.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Cranmer, S. R. (2009) · Living Reviews in Solar Physics · doi:10.12942/lrsp-2009-3 · Cited by 391
Magnetohydrodynamic modeling of the solar corona during Whole Sun Month
(1999) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics · doi:10.1029/1998ja900159 · Cited by 338
Asterospheric Magnetic Fields and Winds of Cool Stars
Schrijver, C. J., DeRosa, M. L., & Title, A. M. (2003) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/374982 · Cited by 44
Metadata
- Authors
- Neugebauer, M., Forsyth, R. J., Galvin, A. B., Harvey, K. L., Hoeksema, J. T., Lazarus, A. J., Lepping, R. P., Linker, J. A., Mikic, Z., Steinberg, J. T., von Steiger, R., Wang, Y. ‐., & Wimmer‐Schweingruber, R. F.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1998-07
- Volume
- 103
- Issue
- A7
- Pages
- 14587-14599
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2071154966
- Cited by
- 229
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Spatial structure of the solar wind and comparisons with solar data and models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/98ja00798
- The paper
- Neugebauer, M., Forsyth, R. J., Galvin, A. B., Harvey, K. L., Hoeksema, J. T., Lazarus, A. J., Lepping, R. P., Linker, J. A., Mikic, Z., Steinberg, J. T., von Steiger, R., Wang, Y. ‐., & Wimmer‐Schweingruber, R. F. (1998). Spatial structure of the solar wind and comparisons with solar data and models. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics. https://doi.org/10.1029/98ja00798
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.