Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 198

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Occurrence of equatorial F region irregularities: Evidence for tropospheric seeding

Open access
McClure, J. P., Singh, S., Bamgboye, D. K., Johnson, F. S., Kil, Hyosub·1998·Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics

Abstract

We present a new gap‐free version of the seasonal and longitudinal (s/l) variations of P EFI, the equatorial F region irregularity (EFI) occurrence probability, based on data from the AE‐E spacecraft. The agreement of this and three earlier partial P EFI patterns verifies all four. We reinterpret another earlier gap‐ridden pattern, that of a topside ionogram index of average darkening by range spread F. We comparent with P EFI and, using ionosonde radio science considerations, we conclude that = P EFI times a factor depending on the average number of topside plasma bubbles visible to the ionosonde. The s/l variations of thus imply s/l variations in the average spacing of bubbles, whose seeds have an occurrence probability pattern P seed. For discussion we assume P EFI = P inst P seed, where P inst is the pattern of F region instability. The P EFI pattern, which is by definition independent of seed and/or bubble spacing, is far too complex to be explained by the dominant paradigm, that of changes in P inst by simple changes in the F region altitude and/or north–south asymmetry. We examine evidence behind this dominance, and find it unconvincing. Both the asymmetry and sunset‐node/altitude hypotheses of 1984 and 1985, respectively, seem to be partly based on misunderstood data, and their features appear displaced in time and space from those of our repeat able P EFI pattern. In contrast, if P seed variations influence the P EFI pattern and depend on thermospheric gravity waves from tropospheric convection near the dip equator, then the seasonal maxima (minima) of P EFI could be explained, since they all occur above relatively warm (cold) surface features, where convection is maximal (minimal). Also, the hypothesis of the dominance of the Pseed term could explain an unusual December/January P EFI maximum in the deep, wide, normal Pacific minimum in the one data set obtained in El Niño years. Based on the experiments we consider, we predict that the s/l variations of P seed will be found to be similar to those of P EFI, and largely to explain them. Finally, we find reasons, based on the similarity of the variations to s/l patterns of the average scintillation index, for not using, as is commonly done, such scintillation patterns as substitutes for P EFI or P inst patterns.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/98ja02749

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 198

Metadata

Authors
McClure, J. P., Singh, S., Bamgboye, D. K., Johnson, F. S., & Kil, H.
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics
Published
1998-12
Volume
103
Issue
A12
Pages
29119-29135
ISSN
0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2080031550
Cited by
198
References
2
FWCI
2.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Occurrence of equatorial F region irregularities: Evidence for tropospheric seeding. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/98ja02749
The paper
McClure, J. P., Singh, S., Bamgboye, D. K., Johnson, F. S., & Kil, H. (1998). Occurrence of equatorial F region irregularities: Evidence for tropospheric seeding. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics. https://doi.org/10.1029/98ja02749

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.