Cited by 38Oceanographic and Atmospheric ProcessesMeteorological Phenomena and SimulationsOcean Waves and Remote Sensing

Surface heat flux variability over the northern California shelf

Beardsley, Robert C., Dever, Edward P., Lentz, Steven J., Dean, Jerome P.·1998·Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans

Abstract

Surface heat flux components are estimated at a midshelf site over the northern California shelf using moored measurements from the 1981–1982 Coastal Ocean Dynamics Experiment (CODE) and the 1988–1989 Shelf Mixed Layer Experiment (SMILE). Time series of estimated fluxes extend from early winter through summer upwelling conditions, allowing examination of seasonal variations as well as synoptic events. On a seasonal timescale, the surface heat flux is strongly influenced net surface heat flux are the annual variation in incident shortwave solar radiation (insolation) and the atmospheric spring transition. Between mid‐November 1988 and late February 1989, insolation is weak and the mean daily averaged heat flux is nearly zero (absolute value less than 10 W m−2), with a standard deviation of ∼50 W m−2. Beginning in March, insolation increases markedly, and typical daily‐averaged heat fluxes increase to greater than 100 W m−2 by the spring transition in April or May. In June and July, the average heat flux is near 200 W m−2, with a standard deviation of ∼90 W m−2. In winter, the daily‐averaged heat flux varies on periods of several days. Net heat flux losses can range up to 130 W m−2. These losses are not identified with any one type of event. For example, comparable heat flux losses can occur for very low relative humidities (RHs), moderate winds, and clear skies, and for high RHs, high winds, and cloudy skies. In summer, surface heat flux variability is strongly influenced by u…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/98jc01458

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Beardsley, R. C., Dever, E. P., Lentz, S. J., & Dean, J. P.
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans
Published
1998-09-15
Volume
103
Issue
C10
Pages
21553-21586
ISSN
0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2120866201
Cited by
38
References
1
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2
FWCI
1.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Ocean Waves and Remote Sensing
Keywords
surface heat flux, coastal upwelling, solar irradiation, shortwave radiation, longwave radiative cooling, latent heat flux, seasonal variation, synoptic variability, spring transition, relative humidity, equatorward winds

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review