The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Modeling the radiative characteristics of airborne mineral aerosols at infrared wavelengths
Open accessAbstract
We explore the importance of the composition of airborne mineral aerosols for assessments of their direct radiative forcing at infrared wavelengths. Our calculations employing Mie theory and data on spectral refractive indices show that the existing variations in refractive indices can cause large changes in the major aerosol optical characteristics. Calculations of IR radiative forcings at the top of the atmosphere and IR downward and upward fluxes, based on an one‐dimensional radiation transfer code, give a wide range of results for varying optical models of the mineral aerosols. We estimate that for a “low dust loading” scenario the changes in IR downward flux at the surface relative to dust free conditions are in the range from 7 to 14 W/m 2 depending upon the mineral aerosol selected. Under “dry tropics” atmospheric conditions the IR forcing at the top of the atmosphere is in the range from 2 to 7 W/m 2. In turn, for a “high dust loading” scenario the calculated changes, relative to dust free conditions, in IR downward flux at the surface vary from 50 to 80 W/m 2, and the IR forcing at the top of the atmosphere varies from 15 to 25 W/m 2. Therefore, we conclude that incorporation of regionally and temporally varying dust mineralogical composition into general circulation models could be beneficial for decreasing the currently large uncertainties in the assessment of radiative forcing by the natural and anthropogenic components of the airborne mineral aerosols. Also the use of appropriate mineralogical data is required for remote sensing of the atmospheric aerosols using satellite infrared observations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Estimates of the direct and indirect radiative forcing due to tropospheric aerosols: A review
Haywood, J., & Boucher, O. (2000) · Reviews of Geophysics · doi:10.1029/1999rg000078 · Cited by 2,097
Dust cycle: An emerging core theme in Earth system science
Shao, Y., Wyrwoll, K.-H., Chappell, A., Huang, J., Lin, Z., McTainsh, G. H., Mikami, M., Tanaka, T. Y., Wang, X., & Yoon, S. (2011) · Aeolian Research · doi:10.1016/j.aeolia.2011.02.001 · Cited by 1,085
Sokolik, I. N., & Toon, O. B. (1999) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/1998jd200048 · Cited by 939
Self-citationThe impact of dust storms on the Arabian Peninsula and the Red Sea
Jish Prakash, P., Stenchikov, G., Kalenderski, S., Osipov, S., & Bangalath, H. (2015) · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.5194/acp-15-199-2015 · Cited by 294
Monitoring intense dust storms over the Indian region using satellite data – a case study
Gharai, B., Jose, S., & Mahalakshmi, D. V. (2013) · International Journal of Remote Sensing · doi:10.1080/01431161.2013.813655 · Cited by 27
Metadata
- Authors
- Sokolik, I. N., Toon, O. B., & Bergstrom, R. W.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1998-04
- Volume
- 103
- Issue
- D8
- Pages
- 8813-8826
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2009849014
- Cited by
- 219
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Modeling the radiative characteristics of airborne mineral aerosols at infrared wavelengths. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/98jd00049
- The paper
- Sokolik, I. N., Toon, O. B., & Bergstrom, R. W. (1998). Modeling the radiative characteristics of airborne mineral aerosols at infrared wavelengths. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/98jd00049
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.