Galileo Probe measurements of thermal and solar radiation fluxes in the Jovian atmosphere.
Open accessAbstract
The Galileo probe net flux radiometer (NFR) measured radiation fluxes in Jupiter's atmosphere from about 0.44 to 14 bars, using five spectral channels to separate solar and thermal components. Onboard calibration results confirm that the NFR responded to radiation approximately as expected. NFR channels also responded to a superimposed thermal perturbation, which can be approximately removed using blind channel measurements and physical constraints. Evidence for the expected NH3 cloud was seen in the spectral character of spin‐induced modulations of the direct solar beam signals. These results are consistent with an overlying cloud of small NH3 ice particles (0.5–0.75 μm in radius) of optical depth 1.5–2 at 0.5 μm. Such a cloud would have so little effect on thermal fluxes that NFR thermal channels provide no additional constraints on its properties. However, evidence for heating near 0.45 bar in the NFR thermal channels would seem to require either an additional opacity source beyond this small‐particle cloud, implying a heterogeneous cloud structure to avoid conflicts with solar modulation results, or a change in temperature lapse rate just above the probe measurements. The large thermal flux levels imply water vapor mixing ratios that are only 6% of solar at 10 bars, but possibly increasing with depth, and significantly subsaturated ammonia at pressures less than 3 bars. If deep NH3 mixing ratios at the probe entry site are 3–4 times ground‐based inferences, as suggested by probe radio signal attenuation, then only half as much water is needed to match NFR observations. No evidence of a water cloud was seen near the 5‐bar level. The 5‐μm thermal channel detected the presumed NH4SH cloud base near 1.35 bars. Effects of this cloud were also seen in the solar channel upflux measurements but not in the solar net fluxes, implying that the cloud is a conservative scatterer of sunlight. The minor thermal signature of this cloud is compatible with particle radii near 3 μm, but it cannot rule out smaller particles. Deeper than about 3 bars, solar channels indicate unexpectedly large absorption of sunlight at wavelengths longer than 0.6 μm, which might be due to unaccounted‐for absorption by NH3 between 0.65 and 1.5 μm.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The chosen solar optical properties (t_s0 = 3.0 at p0 = 3.0 bar) give a solar radiative flux qualitatively consistent with Galileo probe measurements in Jupiter.
“This gives a solar radiative flux qualitatively consistent with Galileo probe measurements in Jupiter (Sromovsky et al. 1998).”
From Mechanisms of Jet Formation on the Giant Planets (2010) · cites this paper as Sromovsky et al. 1998
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 98 · Cited by 98
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Wiscombe, W. J., Extension of the doubling method to inhomoge- 21562202e, 1998, E10, · DOI
- Authors
- Sromovsky, L. A., Collard, A. D., Fry, P. M., Orton, G. S., Lemmon, M. T., Tomasko, M. G., & Freedman, R. S.
- Affiliations
- California Institute of Technology (US)
- University of Arizona (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1998-09
- Volume
- 103
- Issue
- E10
- Pages
- 22929-22977
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2004393068
- Cited by
- 98
- References
- 98
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 6.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astro and Planetary Science
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Planetary Science and Exploration
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
- Keywords
- Jupiter atmosphere, Galileo probe, solar flux, radiative heat flux, water vapor mixing ratio, cloud opacity, lapse rate, cloud particle size
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review