The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Methane production and emission in a Texas rice field
Abstract
To refine estimates of source strengths from agricultural wetlands and to study the process of methane production and emission, this study was carried out in rice fields at the Texas A&M University Agricultural Research and Extension Center, Beaumont, Texas, during the summer of 1989. It focussed on two fields on different soil types (Lake Charles clay and Beaumont clay) and spanned a period from shortly after permanent field flooding (June 6, 1989) until field draining prior to harvest (August 28, 1989). Integrated methane emission over 75 days ranged from 4.5 to 15.9 g m−2 . Aboveground biomass, net primary production, and root biomass were determined. Methane emission was strongly related to aboveground biomass in one of two fields studied. Laboratory incubations of soil cores show that methane production by soil bacteria is highest near the soil surface in the rice row and decreases with depth and distance from the plant. Much of the seasonal increase in total methane production is due to increasing activity at intermediate depths and distances from the plants. The temporal and spatial distribution of methane production was found to be related to root biomass. Seasonally integrated emission was 42% of methane production in both fields. Soil pore water methane and plant stem gas composition are related to the distribution in the soil of methane production and root biomass. Methane production ceased with field draining prior to harvest, even following prolonged anaerobic incubation. Methanogenesis rapidly resumed with added acetate substrate.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Production, oxidation, emission and consumption of methane by soils: A review
Le Mer, J., & Roger, P. (2001) · European Journal of Soil Biology · doi:10.1016/s1164-5563(01)01067-6 · Cited by 2,123
Methane production and methane consumption: a review of processes underlying wetland methane fluxes
Segers, R. (1998) · Biogeochemistry · doi:10.1023/a:1005929032764 · Cited by 907
An agronomic assessment of greenhouse gas emissions from major cereal crops
Linquist, B., van Groenigen, K. J., Adviento‐Borbe, M. A., Pittelkow, C., & van Kessel, C. (2012) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02502.x · Cited by 699
Statistical analysis of the major variables controlling methane emission from rice fields
Yan, X., Yagi, K., Akiyama, H., & Akimoto, H. (2005) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.00976.x · Cited by 382
Plant‐dependent CH4 emission in a subarctic Canadian fen
Whiting, G. J., & Chanton, J. P. (1992) · Global Biogeochemical Cycles · doi:10.1029/92gb00710 · Cited by 300
Metadata
- Authors
- Sass, R. L., Fisher, F. M., Harcombe, P. A., & Turner, F. T.
- Venue
- Global Biogeochemical Cycles
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1990-03
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 47-68
- ISSN
- 0886-6236 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-9224
- OpenAlex
- W2054678919
- Cited by
- 354
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 28.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Methane production and emission in a Texas rice field. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/gb004i001p00047
- The paper
- Sass, R. L., Fisher, F. M., Harcombe, P. A., & Turner, F. T. (1990). Methane production and emission in a Texas rice field. Global Biogeochemical Cycles. https://doi.org/10.1029/gb004i001p00047
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.