The DOI matches its Crossref record; 103 of the 103 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An agronomic assessment of greenhouse gas emissions from major cereal crops
Abstract
Agricultural greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions contribute approximately 12% to total global anthropogenic GHG emissions. Cereals (rice, wheat, and maize) are the largest source of human calories, and it is estimated that world cereal production must increase by 1.3% annually to 2025 to meet growing demand. Sustainable intensification of cereal production systems will require maintaining high yields while reducing environmental costs. We conducted a meta‐analysis (57 published studies consisting of 62 study sites and 328 observations) to test the hypothesis that the global warming potential (GWP) of CH4 and N2O emissions from rice, wheat, and maize, when expressed per ton of grain (yield‐scaled GWP), is similar, and that the lowest value for each cereal is achieved at near optimal yields. Results show that the GWP of CH4 and N2O emissions from rice (3757 kg CO2 eq ha−1 season−1) was higher than wheat (662 kg CO2 eq ha−1 season−1) and maize (1399 kg CO2 eq ha−1 season−1). The yield‐scaled GWP of rice was about four times higher (657 kg CO2 eq Mg−1) than wheat (166 kg CO2 eq Mg−1) and maize (185 kg CO2 eq Mg−1). Across cereals, the lowest yield‐scaled GWP values were achieved at 92% of maximal yield and were about twice as high for rice (279 kg CO2 eq Mg−1) than wheat (102 kg CO2 eq Mg−1) or maize (140 kg CO2 eq Mg−1), suggesting greater mitigation opportunities for rice systems. In rice, wheat and maize, 0.68%, 1.21%, and 1.06% of N applied was emitted as N2O, respectively. In rice systems, there was no correlation between CH4 emissions and N rate. In addition, when evaluating issues related to food security and environmental sustainability, other factors including cultural significance, the provisioning of ecosystem services, and human health and well‐being must also be considered.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Human domination of Earth’s ecosystems
Vitousek, P. M., Mooney, H. A., Lubchenco, J., & Melillo, J. M. (1997) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.277.5325.494 · Cited by 9,086
Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices
Tilman, D., Cassman, K. G., Matson, P. A., Naylor, R., & Polasky, S. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01014 · Cited by 7,957
Griggs, D. J., & Noguer, M. (2002) · Weather · doi:10.1256/004316502320517344 · Cited by 5,754
The meta-analysis of response ratios in experimental ecology
Hedges, L. V., Gurevitch, J., & Curtis, P. S. (1999) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[1150:tmaorr]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 4,704 · cited 2×
“We used the natural log (lnR) of the response ratio as our effect size (Hedges et al., 1999):”
MethodAgricultural Intensification and Ecosystem Properties
Matson, P. A., Parton, W. J., Power, A. G., & Swift, M. J. (1997) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.277.5325.504 · Cited by 3,160
Environmental, economic, and energetic costs and benefits of biodiesel and ethanol biofuels
Hill, J., Nelson, E., Tilman, D., Polasky, S., & Tiffany, D. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0604600103 · Cited by 2,871
Reducing environmental risk by improving N management in intensive Chinese agricultural systems
Ju, X.-T., Xing, G.-X., Chen, X.-P., Zhang, S.-L., Zhang, L.-J., Liu, X.-J., Cui, Z.-L., Yin, B., Christie, P., Zhu, Z.-L., et al. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0813417106 · Cited by 2,599
Soil Organic Carbon Sequestration Rates by Tillage and Crop Rotation: A Global Data Analysis
West, T. O., & Post, W. M. (2002) · Soil Science Society of America Journal · doi:10.2136/sssaj2002.1930 · Cited by 2,215 · cited 1×
“It is generally agreed that the net balance between C respiration and fixation in a cropping system is reflected by changes in soil organic carbon over time (West & Post, 2002; Stewart et al., 2007).”
BackgroundCrop Yield Gaps: Their Importance, Magnitudes, and Causes
Lobell, D. B., Cassman, K. G., & Field, C. B. (2009) · Annual Review of Environment and Resources · doi:10.1146/annurev.environ.041008.093740 · Cited by 1,523
Cassman, K. G. (1999) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.96.11.5952 · Cited by 1,450
Cited by
Walling, E., & Vaneeckhaute, C. (2020) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111211 · Cited by 408
Poulton, P., Johnston, J., Macdonald, A., White, R., & Powlson, D. (2018) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.14066 · Cited by 379
Management Strategies to Mitigate N2O Emissions in Agriculture
Hassan, M. U., Aamer, M., Mahmood, A., Awan, M. I., Barbanti, L., Seleiman, M. F., Bakhsh, G., Alkharabsheh, H. M., Babur, E., Shao, J., et al. (2022) · Life · doi:10.3390/life12030439 · Cited by 199
Qin, Z., Zhuang, Q., & Zhu, X. (2015) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/gcbb.12106 · Cited by 28
Livelihood and climate trade-offs in Kenyan peri-urban vegetable production
Kurgat, B. K., Stöber, S., Mwonga, S., Lotze-Campen, H., & Rosenstock, T. S. (2018) · Agricultural Systems · doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2017.10.003 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Linquist, B., van Groenigen, K. J., Adviento‐Borbe, M. A., Pittelkow, C., & van Kessel, C.
- Venue
- Global Change Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-09-08
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 194-209
- ISSN
- 1354-1013 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2486
- OpenAlex
- W2166501179
- Cited by
- 699
- References
- 103
- FWCI
- 42.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An agronomic assessment of greenhouse gas emissions from major cereal crops. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02502.x
- The paper
- Linquist, B., van Groenigen, K. J., Adviento‐Borbe, M. A., Pittelkow, C., & van Kessel, C. (2012). An agronomic assessment of greenhouse gas emissions from major cereal crops. Global Change Biology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02502.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.