Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 327

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Using Dynamo Theory to predict the sunspot number during Solar Cycle 21

Schatten, Kenneth H., Scherrer, Philip H., Svalgaard, Leif, Wilcox, John M.·1978·Geophysical Research Letters

Abstract

On physical grounds it is suggested that the sun's polar field strength near a solar minimum is closely related to the following cycle's solar activity. Four methods of estimating the sun's polar magnetic field strength near solar minimum are employed to provide an estimate of cycle 21's yearly mean sunspot number at solar maximum of 140 ± 20. We think of this estimate as a first order attempt to predict the cycle's activity using one parameter of physical importance based upon dynamo theory.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/gl005i005p00411

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 327

Metadata

Authors
Schatten, K. H., Scherrer, P. H., Svalgaard, L., & Wilcox, J. M.
Venue
Geophysical Research Letters
Published
1978-05
Volume
5
Issue
5
Pages
411-414
ISSN
  • 0094-8276 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-8007
OpenAlex
W2041890117
Cited by
327
References
1
FWCI
3.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Using Dynamo Theory to predict the sunspot number during Solar Cycle 21. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/gl005i005p00411
The paper
Schatten, K. H., Scherrer, P. H., Svalgaard, L., & Wilcox, J. M. (1978). Using Dynamo Theory to predict the sunspot number during Solar Cycle 21. Geophysical Research Letters. https://doi.org/10.1029/gl005i005p00411

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.