Interannual variability versus seasonal variability in the Tropical Atlantic
Abstract
Monthly fields of sea surface temperature and wind stress for the tropical Atlantic are constructed for January 1964 to December 1979. Inside the Gulf of Guinea the amplitude of the seasonal variability of SST ranges between 2.5 and 4 times greater than the interannual variability. In the remainder of the equatorial Atlantic this measure is less than 2. Standard deviations of wind stress anomalies indicate that, except near the Intertropical Convergence Zone, the magnitude of interannual fluctuations are greater than seasonal ones. The joint analyses of these SST and wind stress fields indicate the largest positive SST anomaly in the Gulf of Guinea (July, 1968) was immediately preceded by the only reversal of the trade winds west along the equator.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Tropical Atlantic interannual variability is strongly linked to the seasonal cycle.
“which suggests that the tropical Atlantic interannual variability is strongly linked to the seasonal cycle.”
From Sea surface temperature patterns in the Tropical Atlantic: Principal component analysis and nonlinear principal component analysis (2017) · cites this paper as Picaut et al. (1984)
Interannual changes in SST are largest in regions where the seasonal SST signal is large, including the ACT region.
“The result is that interannual changes in SST are largest in regions where the seasonal SST signal is large, including the ACT region”
From Sea surface temperature patterns in the Tropical Atlantic: Principal component analysis and nonlinear principal component analysis (2017) · cites this paper as Picaut et al. (1984)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Illig, S., Dewitte, B., Ayoub, N., du Penhoat, Y., Reverdin, G., De Mey, P., Bonjean, F., & Lagerloef, G. S. E. (2004) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans · doi:10.1029/2003jc001771 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Simulation of the nitrate seasonal cycle in the equatorial Atlantic Ocean during 1983 and 1984
Loukos, H., & Mémery, L. (1999) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans · doi:10.1029/1999jc900084 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Kenfack, C. S., Mkankam, F. K., Alory, G., Penhoat, Y. D., Hounkonnou, M. N., Vondou, D. A., & Jr., B. G. N. (2017) · Terrestrial, Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences · doi:10.3319/tao.2016.08.29.01 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
- Authors
- Picaut, J., Servain, J., Busalacchi, A. J., & Seva, M.
- Venue
- Geophysical Research Letters
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1984-08
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 787-790
- ISSN
- 0094-8276 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-8007
- OpenAlex
- W1972651932
- Cited by
- 23
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 3.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Geophysical Research Letters (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
- Keywords
- interannual variability, seasonal variation, sea surface temperature, wind stress, tropical Atlantic, Gulf of Guinea, equatorial Atlantic, Intertropical Convergence Zone, sea surface temperature anomalies, wind stress anomalies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review