The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Ocean Carbon Pumps: Analysis of Relative Strengths and Efficiencies in Ocean-Driven Atmospheric CO2 Changes
Abstract
An ocean carbon pump is defined as a process that depletes the ocean surface of σCO2 relative to the deep-water σCO2. Three pumps are recognized: a carbonate pump, a soft-tissue pump, and a solubility pump. The first two result from the biological flux of organic and CaCO3 detritus from the ocean's surface. The third results from the increased CO2 solubility in downwelling cold water and is demonstrated by a one-dimensional upwelling-diffusion model of an abiotic ocean. In the soft-tissue and solubility pumps, working strengths are defined in terms of the ΔσCO2 each creates between surface and deep-water. Efficiencies of each pump are quantified as a ratio of working strength to potential maximum strength. Using alkalinity, nitrate, and σCO2 to remove the carbonate pump signal from ocean or model data, the individual working strengths of the soft-tissue and solubility pumps can be calculated by scaling the soft-tissue's ΔσCO2 to the surface-to-deep ΔPO4. This technique is applied to a three-box ocean model known to demonstrate high-latitude control of atmospheric CO2 through a variety of circulation and biological changes. Considering each pump separately reveals that the various changes which lower pCO2atm in the model are caused primarily by an increased solubility pump. Analysis of global ocean data indicates a positive solubility pump signal, subject to uncertainties in the C:P Redfield ratio and in the preindustrial pCO2atm. If C:P = 105 and pCO2atm = 270 μatm, the efficiency of the solubility pump is about 0.5. We suggest that this type of analysis of relative carbon pump strengths will be an effective method for inter-model and intra-model comparison and diagnosis of underlying oceanic mechanisms for pCO2atm changes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Hartmann, J., West, A. J., Renforth, P., Köhler, P., De La Rocha, C. L., Wolf‐Gladrow, D. A., Dürr, H. H., & Scheffran, J. (2013) · Reviews of Geophysics · doi:10.1002/rog.20004 · Cited by 717
Buesseler, K. O., & Boyd, P. W. (2009) · Limnology and Oceanography · doi:10.4319/lo.2009.54.4.1210 · Cited by 508
Abrupt Climate Change and Transient Climates during the Paleogene: A Marine Perspective
Zachos, J. C., Lohmann, K. C., Walker, J. C. G., & Wise, S. W. (1993) · The Journal of Geology · doi:10.1086/648216 · Cited by 494
Decreasing marine biogenic calcification: A negative feedback on rising atmospheric p CO 2
Zondervan, I., Zeebe, R. E., Rost, B., & Riebesell, U. (2001) · Global Biogeochemical Cycles · doi:10.1029/2000gb001321 · Cited by 332
Legendre, L., Rivkin, R. B., Weinbauer, M. G., Guidi, L., & Uitz, J. (2015) · Progress In Oceanography · doi:10.1016/j.pocean.2015.01.008 · Cited by 215
Metadata
- Authors
- Volk, T., & Hoffert, M. I.
- Venue
- Geophysical Monograph Series
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union
- Published
- 2013-03-18
- Pages
- 99-110
- ISSN
- 0065-8448 (ISSN-L)
- 2328-8779
- OpenAlex
- W1652686173
- Cited by
- 822
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 34.09
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ocean Carbon Pumps: Analysis of Relative Strengths and Efficiencies in Ocean-Driven Atmospheric CO2 Changes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/gm032p0099
- The paper
- Volk, T., & Hoffert, M. I. (2013). Ocean Carbon Pumps: Analysis of Relative Strengths and Efficiencies in Ocean-Driven Atmospheric CO2 Changes. Geophysical Monograph Series. https://doi.org/10.1029/gm032p0099
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.