Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 353

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Sulfur solubility and magmatic sulfides in submarine basalt glass

Mathez, E. A.·1976·Journal of Geophysical Research

Abstract

A suite of 35 fresh basalt glasses collected in >1000-m water depth from 16 localities on or near the Juan de Fuca Ridge and 17 localities elsewhere in the Atlantic and Pacific basins were examined petrographically and with the microprobe. Most are ridge-type tholeiites, but they span the entire range from quartz to nepheline normative varieties. Every sample contains magmatic sulfide. These are globules which occur in clear glass and are composed of finely intergrown pyrrhotite, Cu-Fe sulfide, and frequently pentlandite. Magnetite can be observed in some of the more coarsely intergrown globules. Bulk sulfide compositions generally include >10% Cu + Ni. Petrographie and chemical data suggest that some basalts erupted in a sulfide-saturated state, and the remainder were nearly saturated prior to their being quenched. Glass inclusions in phenocrysts either have compositions similar to matrix glass or are relatively depleted in elements entering host phenocrysts. In either case, their S concentrations are generally similar to or greater than S concentrations of matrix glasses. This and the usually pristine character of fresh basalts with respect to other volatile and trace elements suggest that S in glasses is predominantly juvenile. Concentrations of S dissolved in glass range from 1000 to 1800 ppm and exhibit a nearly perfect linear covariance with Fe concentrations. Because all the glasses contain sulfides this relationship implies that the Fe concentration in the melt controls gas composition with respect to oxygen and sulfur species. However, the moderate range in Fe concentration of the submarine basalts of this study corresponds to a range in ƒs2 and ƒo2 of only about half an order of magnitude each. That is, they all existed under essentially similar ƒs2 and ƒo2 at equivalent temperatures. Fractional crystallization of olivine should cause sulfide liquids to exsolve from the magma, whereas plagioclase fractionation should drive the liquid further from sulfide saturation. However, in more typical fractionation models involving plagioclase and olivine separation in a ratio of ∼10:3, liquid compositions are driven approximately parallel to a sulfide saturation plane if constant temperature is assumed. Thus fractional crystallization need not involve separation of large quantities of sulfide. Many of the most juvenile unfractionated submarine basaltic magmas are probably sulfide saturated and contain ∼900 ppm S.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/jb081i023p04269

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 353

Metadata

Authors
Mathez, E. A.
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research
Published
1976-08-10
Volume
81
Issue
23
Pages
4269-4276
ISSN
0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2097756509
Cited by
353
References
0
FWCI
5.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sulfur solubility and magmatic sulfides in submarine basalt glass. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/jb081i023p04269
The paper
Mathez, E. A. (1976). Sulfur solubility and magmatic sulfides in submarine basalt glass. Journal of Geophysical Research. https://doi.org/10.1029/jb081i023p04269

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.