The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Subcritical crack growth in geological materials
Abstract
A review is presented of the experimental data on subcritical crack growth in geological materials. The main parameters describing subcritical crack growth are the critical stress intensity factor K c, the subcritical crack growth limit K o, and the stress intensity factor‐crack velocity (K‐v) relationship between K o and K c. The K‐v data are presented in terms of an equation in which the crack velocity depends on stress intensity factor raised to a power n because this is common practice in experimental studies. These data are presented as tables and in synoptic diagrams. For silicates the value of n increases as the environment becomes depleted in hyroxyl species and with increase in the microstructural complexity of the solid. Values of n as low as 9.5 have been found for tensile cracking of quartz in basic environments and as high as 170 for tensile cracking of basalt in moist air. Insufficient experimental data are available to predict subcritical crack growth behavior at depth in the earth's crust without major extrapolations of the data base. Schematic outlines are presented, therefore, of the probable influence on subcritical crack growth of some key parameters in the crustal environment. These include stress intensity factor, temperature, pressure, activity of corrosive environmental agent, microstructure, and residual strains. In addition, a discussion is presented of the likely magnitude of the subcritical crack growth limit. For stress corrosion tensile crack growth of quartz a limit of approximately 0.2 of the critical stress intensity factor is inferred from theoretical calculations. Further problems discussed with regard to the extrapolation of experimental data to crustal conditions include the choice of a suitable equation to describe crack growth and the magnitude of parameters in these equations. A brief discussion of the double torsion testing method is presented in order to aid the interpretation of experimental results because it is almost the sole method used to study subcritical cracking in rocks.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Strength of the lithosphere: Constraints imposed by laboratory experiments
Kohlstedt, D. L., Evans, B., & Mackwell, S. J. (1995) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth · doi:10.1029/95jb01460 · Cited by 1,603
Chester, F. M., & Logan, J. M. (1986) · pure and applied geophysics · doi:10.1007/bf00875720 · Cited by 710
Rheology of the lithosphere: Selected topics
Kirby, S. H., & Kronenberg, A. K. (1987) · Reviews of Geophysics · doi:10.1029/rg025i006p01219 · Cited by 695
Lei, Q., Latham, J.-P., & Tsang, C.-F. (2017) · Computers and Geotechnics · doi:10.1016/j.compgeo.2016.12.024 · Cited by 601
Laubach, S. E., Lander, R. H., Criscenti, L. J., Anovitz, L. M., Urai, J. L., Pollyea, R. M., Hooker, J. N., Narr, W., Evans, M. A., Kerisit, S. N., et al. (2019) · Reviews of Geophysics · doi:10.1029/2019rg000671 · Cited by 349
Metadata
- Authors
- Atkinson, B. K.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1984-06-10
- Volume
- 89
- Issue
- B6
- Pages
- 4077-4114
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2055563758
- Cited by
- 1,413
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 51.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Subcritical crack growth in geological materials. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/jb089ib06p04077
- The paper
- Atkinson, B. K. (1984). Subcritical crack growth in geological materials. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth. https://doi.org/10.1029/jb089ib06p04077
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.