The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Geoid anomalies in a dynamic Earth
Abstract
In order to obtain a dynamically consistent relationship between the geoid and the earth's response to internal buoyancy forces, we have calculated potential and surface deformation Love numbers for internal loading. These quantities depend on the depth and harmonic degree of loading. They can be integrated as Green functions to obtain the dynamic response due to an arbitrary distribution of internal density contrasts. Spherically symmetric, self‐gravitating flow models are constructed for a variety of radial Newtonian viscosity variations and flow configurations including both whole mantle and layered convection. We demonstrate that boundary deformation due to internal loading reaches its equilibrium value on the same time scale as postglacial rebound, much less than the time scale for significant change in the convective flow pattern, by calculating relaxation times for a series of spherically symmetric viscous earth models. For uniform mantle viscosity the geoid signature due to boundary deformations is larger than that due to internal loads, resulting in net negative geoid anomalies for positive density contrasts. Geoid anomalies from intermediate‐wavelength density contrasts are amplified by up to an order of magnitude. Geoid anomalies are primarily the result of density contrasts in the interior of convecting layers; density contrasts near layer boundaries are almost completely compensated. Layered mantle convection results in smaller geoid anomalies than mantle‐wide flow for a given density contrast. Viscosity stratification leads to more complicated spectral signatures. Because of the sensitivity of the dynamic response functions to model parameters, forward models for the geoid can be used to combine several sources of geophysical data (e.g., subducted slab locations, seismic velocity anomalies, surface topography) to constrain better the structure and viscosity of the mantle.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The dynamics of Cenozoic and Mesozoic plate motions
Lithgow‐Bertelloni, C., & Richards, M. A. (1998) · Reviews of Geophysics · doi:10.1029/97rg02282 · Cited by 649
Self-citationMantle dynamics in the Mediterranean: MEDITERRANEAN DYNAMIC
Faccenna, C., Becker, T. W., Auer, L., Billi, A., Boschi, L., Brun, J. P., Capitanio, F. A., Funiciello, F., Horvàth, F., Jolivet, L., et al. (2014) · Reviews of Geophysics · doi:10.1002/2013rg000444 · Cited by 600
A geodynamic model of mantle density heterogeneity
Ricard, Y., Richards, M., Lithgow‐Bertelloni, C., & Le Stunff, Y. (1993) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth · doi:10.1029/93jb02216 · Cited by 466
Self-citationLarge-scale mantle convection and the history of subduction
Richards, M. A., & Engebretson, D. C. (1992) · Nature · doi:10.1038/355437a0 · Cited by 324
Self-citationSteinberger, B., & Calderwood, A. R. (2006) · Geophysical Journal International · doi:10.1111/j.1365-246x.2006.03131.x · Cited by 323
Metadata
- Authors
- Richards, M. A., & Hager, B. H.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1984-07-10
- Volume
- 89
- Issue
- B7
- Pages
- 5987-6002
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2063287321
- Cited by
- 671
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 22.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Geoid anomalies in a dynamic Earth. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/jb089ib07p05987
- The paper
- Richards, M. A., & Hager, B. H. (1984). Geoid anomalies in a dynamic Earth. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth. https://doi.org/10.1029/jb089ib07p05987
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.