The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Reflectance spectroscopy: Quantitative analysis techniques for remote sensing applications
Abstract
Several methods for the analysis of remotely sensed reflectance data are compared, including empirical methods and scattering theories, both of which are important for solving remote sensing problems. The concept of the photon mean optical path length and the implications for use in modeling reflectance spectra are presented. It is shown that the mean optical path length in a particulate surface is in rough inverse proportion to the square root of the absorption coefficient. Thus, the stronger absorber a material is, the less photons will penetrate into the surface. The concept of apparent absorbance (‐In reflectance) is presented, and it is shown that absorption bands, which are Gaussian in shape when plotted as absorption coefficient (true absorbance) versus photon energy, are also Gaussians in apparent absorbance. However, the Gaussians in apparent absorbance have a smaller intensity and a width which is a factor of √2 larger. An apparent continuum in a reflectance spectrum is modeled as a mathematical function used to isolate a particular absorption feature for analysis. It is shown that a continuum should be removed by dividing it into the reflectance spectrum or subtracting it from the apparent absorbance and that the fitting of Gaussians to absorption features should be done using apparent absorbance versus photon energy. Kubelka‐Munk theory is only valid for materials with small total absorption and for bihemispherical reflectance, which are rarely encountered in geologic remote sensing. It is shown that the recently advocated bidirectional reflectance theories have the potential for use in deriving mineral abundance from a reflectance spectrum.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Hyperspectral Unmixing Overview: Geometrical, Statistical, and Sparse Regression-Based Approaches
Bioucas-Dias, J. M., Plaza, A., Dobigeon, N., Parente, M., Du, Q., Gader, P., & Chanussot, J. (2012) · IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/jstars.2012.2194696 · Cited by 2,836
Keshava, N., & Mustard, J. F. (2002) · IEEE Signal Processing Magazine · doi:10.1109/79.974727 · Cited by 2,549
Nonlinear Unmixing of Hyperspectral Images: Models and Algorithms
Dobigeon, N., Tourneret, J.-Y., Richard, C., Bermudez, J. C. M., McLaughlin, S., & Hero, A. O. (2014) · IEEE Signal Processing Magazine · doi:10.1109/msp.2013.2279274 · Cited by 420
Milliken, R. E., Mustard, J. F., Poulet, F., Jouglet, D., Bibring, J., Gondet, B., & Langevin, Y. (2007) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets · doi:10.1029/2006je002853 · Cited by 131
Novel proximal sensing for monitoring soil organic C stocks and condition
Viscarra Rossel, R. A., Lobsey, C. R., Sharman, C., Flick, P., & McLachlan, G. (2017) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.7b00889 · Cited by 116
Metadata
- Authors
- Clark, R. N., & Roush, T. L.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1984-07-10
- Volume
- 89
- Issue
- B7
- Pages
- 6329-6340
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2019038438
- Cited by
- 2,055
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reflectance spectroscopy: Quantitative analysis techniques for remote sensing applications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/jb089ib07p06329
- The paper
- Clark, R. N., & Roush, T. L. (1984). Reflectance spectroscopy: Quantitative analysis techniques for remote sensing applications. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth. https://doi.org/10.1029/jb089ib07p06329
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.