The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The scaling of complex craters
Abstract
The empirical relation between the transient crater diameter (D g ) and final crater diameter (D r ) of complex craters and basins is estimated using cumulative terrace widths, central uplift diameters, continuous ejecta radii, and transient crater reconstructions determined from lunar and terrestrial impact structures. The ratio D g /D r is a power law function of D r , decreasing uniformly from unity at the diameter of the simple‐complex crater morphology transition to about 0.5 for large multiring basins like Imbrium on the moon. The empirical constants in the D g /D r relation are interpreted physically to mean that the position of the final rim relative to the transient crater, and hence the extent of collapse, is controlled or greatly influenced by the properties of the zone of dissociated material produced by the impact shock. The continuity of the D g /D r relation over the entire spectrum of morphologic types from complex craters to multiring basins implies that the rims of all these structures form in the same tectonic environment despite morphologic differences.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Transient cavity diameter scales as 0.57 times final rim diameter.
“Croft (1985) 139 D tc = 0.57 D fr”
From Tectonic influences on the morphometry of the Sudbury impact structure: Implications for terrestrial cratering and modeling (2004) · cites this paper as Croft (1985)
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 68
- Beatty J. K., 1980, Crater hunting in Brazil, Sky and Telescope, 59, 464
- Bevington P. R., 1969, Data Reduction and Error Analysis for the Physical Sciences
- Croft S. K. Lunar crater volumes: Interpretation by models of impact cratering and upper crustal structure Proc. Lunar Planet Sci. Conf. 9th 3711–3733 1978.
- Croft S. K. Impact craters from centimeters to megameters Ph.D. thesis Univ. of Calif. Los Angeles 264 pp. 1979.
- Croft S. K. Cratering flow fields: Implications for the excavation and transient expansion stages of crater formation Proc. Lunar Planet. Sci. Conf. 11th 2347–2378 1980.
- Croft S. K. The excavation stage of basin formation: A qualitative model Proceedings of the Conference on Multi‐ring Basins: Formation and EvolutionR. B.Merrill P. H.Schultz 207–225 Pergamon New York 1981a.
- Croft S. K. The modification stage of basin formation: Conditions of ring formation Proceedings of the Conference on Multi‐ring Basins: Formation and EvolutionR. B.Merrill P. H.Schultz 227–257 Pergamon New York 1981b.
- 10.1029/JB088iS01p00B71 · DOI
- Croft S. K., 1984, Cratering on Ganymede: comparisons with the terrestrial planets, Icarus
- Currie K. L. Geological notes on the Carswell circular structure Saskatchewan (74k) Geol. Survey Canada Paper 67‐32 60 1969. · DOI
- Dence M. R., 1977, Impact and Explosion Cratering, 247
- 10.1029/GL004i009p00380 · DOI
- Fahrig W. F. The geology of the Athabasca Formation Geol. Survey Canada Bull. 68 41 1961. · DOI
- 10.14430/arctic2646 · DOI
- Gall H., 1977, Zum geologischen Bau der Randzone des Impaktkraters Nordlinger Ries, Neues Jahrb. Geol. Paleontol, Monatsh., 1977, 65
- 10.1029/JB080i017p02444 · DOI
- 10.1029/JB088iS02p0A807 · DOI
- Grieve R. A. F. P. B.Robertson M. R.Dence Constraints on the formation of ring impact structures based on terrestrial data Proceedings of the Conference on Multi‐ring Basins: Formation and EvolutionR. B.Merrill P. H.Schultz 37–57 Pergamon New York 1981.
- 10.1007/BF00620390 · DOI
- Head J. W. The significance of substrate characteristics in determining morphology and morphometry of lunar craters Proc. Lunar Sci. Conf. 7th 2913–2929 1976.
- 10.1016/0019-1035(78)90169-0 · DOI
- Holsapple K. A., 1984, Lunar and Planetary Science, 367
- Holsapple K. A. andR. M.Schmidt A material strength model for apparent crater volume Proc. Lunar Planet. Sci. Conf. 10th 2757–2777 1979.
- 10.1029/JB087iB03p01849 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF02672808 · DOI
- 10.1029/RG021i008p01667 · DOI
- 10.1029/JB088iB03p02485 · DOI
- 10.1029/JZ066i007p02225 · DOI
- Krinov E. L., 1963, The Moon, Meteorites and Comets, 208
- Lambert P., 1982, Rochechouart: A flat crater from a clustered impact (abstract), Meteoritics, 17, 240
- Laney R. T. andW. R.Van Schmus A structural study of the Kentland Indiana impact site Proc. Lunar Planet. Sci. Conf. 9th 2609–2632 1978.
- 10.1130/0016-7606(1969)80[735:OOLM]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1080/00206817609471342 · DOI
- 10.1080/00206817209475701 · DOI
- McHone J. F. Riachao Ring Brazil: A possible meteorite crater discovered by Apollo astronauts inApollo‐Soyuz Test Project: Summary Science Report Vol. II edited byF.El‐Baz andD. M.Warner pp.193–202 NASA SP‐412 Washington D. C. 1979.
- Melosh H. J., 1977, Impact and Explosion Cratering, 1245
- 10.1029/JB084iB13p07513 · DOI
- 10.1029/JB087iB01p00371 · DOI
- Moore H. J. C. A.Hodges andD. H.Scott Multiringed basins‐illustrated by Orientale and associated features Proc. Lunar Sci. Conf. 5th 71–100 1974.
- Morrison G. G. Morphological features of the Sudbury Crater (abstract) Papers Presented to the Conference on Multi‐ringed Basins: Formation and Evolution 63–64Lunar and Planetary Institute Houston 1980.
- 10.1007/BF01259285 · DOI
- Mutch T. A., 1972, Geology of the Moon
- 10.1029/JZ067i005p01965 · DOI
- 10.1080/00206817609471165 · DOI
- 10.1029/GL001i007p00291 · DOI
- 10.1016/0012-821X(74)90114-9 · DOI
- Pike R. J., 1977, Impact and Explosion Cratering, 489
- Pike R. J. Control of crater morphology by gravity and target type: Mars earth moon Proc. Lunar Planet. Sci. Conf. 11th 2159–2189 1980.
- Pohl J., 1977, Impact and Explosion Cratering, 343
- 10.1080/00206817509471590 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1965.tb20388.x · DOI
- 10.1139/e83-101 · DOI
- Roddy D. J., 1968, Shock Metamorphism of Natural Materials, 291
- Roddy D. J. Structural deformation at the Flynn Creek impact crater Tennessee: A preliminary report on deep drilling Proc. Lunar Planet. Sci. Conf. 10th 2519–2534 1979.
- 10.1029/JB076i023p05414 · DOI
- Schmidt R. M., 1984, Lunar and Planetary Science, 722
- Schultz P. H., 1978, Lunar and Planetary Science, 1033
- 10.1029/JB084iB06p03081 · DOI
- Shoemaker E. M., 1962, Physics and Astronomy of the Moon, 283
- 10.1146/annurev.ea.11.050183.002333 · DOI
- Short N. M., 1972, Thickness of impact crater ejecta on the lunar surface, Mod. Geol., 3, 69
- Singer A. V., 1983, Lunar and Planetary Science, 704
- Smith E. I., 1973, Fresh lunar craters: morphology as a function of diameter, a possible criterion for crater origin, Mod. Geol., 4, 51
- 10.1029/JB089iS01p0C197 · DOI
- Strom R. G., 1982, Lunar and Planetary Science, 782
- Wilhelms D. E., 1977, Impact and Explosion Cratering, 539
- Wilshire H. G. T. W.Offield K. A.Howard D.Cummings Geology of the Sierra Madera cryptoexplosion structure Pecos County Texas U.S. Geol. Surv. Prof. Paper S99‐H 42 Washington D. C. 1972. · DOI
- Wood C. A. andJ. W.Head Comparison of impact basins on Mercury Mars and the Moon Proc. Lunar Sci. Conf. 7th 3629–3651 1976.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ganymede crater dimensions – Implications for central peak and central pit formation and development
Bray, V. J., Schenk, P. M., Jay Melosh, H., Morgan, J. V., & Collins, G. S. (2012) · Icarus · doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2011.10.004 · Cited by 77
Spray, J. G., Butler, H. R., & Thompson, L. M. (2004) · Meteoritics & Planetary Science · doi:10.1111/j.1945-5100.2004.tb00341.x · Cited by 75
Oberst, J., Christou, A., Suggs, R., Moser, D., Daubar, I. J., McEwen, A. S., Burchell, M., Kawamura, T., Hiesinger, H., Wünnemann, K., et al. (2012) · Planetary and Space Science · doi:10.1016/j.pss.2012.10.005 · Cited by 58
Metadata
- Authors
- Croft, S. K.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1985-02-15
- Volume
- 90
- Issue
- S02
- ISSN
- 0148-0227
- Cited by
- 195
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review