Cited by 195

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The scaling of complex craters

Croft, Steven K.·1985·Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth

Abstract

The empirical relation between the transient crater diameter (D g ) and final crater diameter (D r ) of complex craters and basins is estimated using cumulative terrace widths, central uplift diameters, continuous ejecta radii, and transient crater reconstructions determined from lunar and terrestrial impact structures. The ratio D g /D r is a power law function of D r , decreasing uniformly from unity at the diameter of the simple‐complex crater morphology transition to about 0.5 for large multiring basins like Imbrium on the moon. The empirical constants in the D g /D r relation are interpreted physically to mean that the position of the final rim relative to the transient crater, and hence the extent of collapse, is controlled or greatly influenced by the properties of the zone of dissociated material produced by the impact shock. The continuity of the D g /D r relation over the entire spectrum of morphologic types from complex craters to multiring basins implies that the rims of all these structures form in the same tectonic environment despite morphologic differences.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/jb090is02p0c828

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 68

  1. Beatty J. K., 1980, Crater hunting in Brazil, Sky and Telescope, 59, 464
  2. Bevington P. R., 1969, Data Reduction and Error Analysis for the Physical Sciences
  3. Croft S. K. Lunar crater volumes: Interpretation by models of impact cratering and upper crustal structure Proc. Lunar Planet Sci. Conf. 9th 3711–3733 1978.
  4. Croft S. K. Impact craters from centimeters to megameters Ph.D. thesis Univ. of Calif. Los Angeles 264 pp. 1979.
  5. Croft S. K. Cratering flow fields: Implications for the excavation and transient expansion stages of crater formation Proc. Lunar Planet. Sci. Conf. 11th 2347–2378 1980.
  6. Croft S. K. The excavation stage of basin formation: A qualitative model Proceedings of the Conference on Multi‐ring Basins: Formation and EvolutionR. B.Merrill P. H.Schultz 207–225 Pergamon New York 1981a.
  7. Croft S. K. The modification stage of basin formation: Conditions of ring formation Proceedings of the Conference on Multi‐ring Basins: Formation and EvolutionR. B.Merrill P. H.Schultz 227–257 Pergamon New York 1981b.
  8. 10.1029/JB088iS01p00B71 · DOI
  9. Croft S. K., 1984, Cratering on Ganymede: comparisons with the terrestrial planets, Icarus
  10. Currie K. L. Geological notes on the Carswell circular structure Saskatchewan (74k) Geol. Survey Canada Paper 67‐32 60 1969. · DOI
  11. Dence M. R., 1977, Impact and Explosion Cratering, 247
  12. 10.1029/GL004i009p00380 · DOI
  13. Fahrig W. F. The geology of the Athabasca Formation Geol. Survey Canada Bull. 68 41 1961. · DOI
  14. 10.14430/arctic2646 · DOI
  15. Gall H., 1977, Zum geologischen Bau der Randzone des Impaktkraters Nordlinger Ries, Neues Jahrb. Geol. Paleontol, Monatsh., 1977, 65
  16. 10.1029/JB080i017p02444 · DOI
  17. 10.1029/JB088iS02p0A807 · DOI
  18. Grieve R. A. F. P. B.Robertson M. R.Dence Constraints on the formation of ring impact structures based on terrestrial data Proceedings of the Conference on Multi‐ring Basins: Formation and EvolutionR. B.Merrill P. H.Schultz 37–57 Pergamon New York 1981.
  19. 10.1007/BF00620390 · DOI
  20. Head J. W. The significance of substrate characteristics in determining morphology and morphometry of lunar craters Proc. Lunar Sci. Conf. 7th 2913–2929 1976.
  21. 10.1016/0019-1035(78)90169-0 · DOI
  22. Holsapple K. A., 1984, Lunar and Planetary Science, 367
  23. Holsapple K. A. andR. M.Schmidt A material strength model for apparent crater volume Proc. Lunar Planet. Sci. Conf. 10th 2757–2777 1979.
  24. 10.1029/JB087iB03p01849 · DOI
  25. 10.1007/BF02672808 · DOI
  26. 10.1029/RG021i008p01667 · DOI
  27. 10.1029/JB088iB03p02485 · DOI
  28. 10.1029/JZ066i007p02225 · DOI
  29. Krinov E. L., 1963, The Moon, Meteorites and Comets, 208
  30. Lambert P., 1982, Rochechouart: A flat crater from a clustered impact (abstract), Meteoritics, 17, 240
  31. Laney R. T. andW. R.Van Schmus A structural study of the Kentland Indiana impact site Proc. Lunar Planet. Sci. Conf. 9th 2609–2632 1978.
  32. 10.1130/0016-7606(1969)80[735:OOLM]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  33. 10.1080/00206817609471342 · DOI
  34. 10.1080/00206817209475701 · DOI
  35. McHone J. F. Riachao Ring Brazil: A possible meteorite crater discovered by Apollo astronauts inApollo‐Soyuz Test Project: Summary Science Report Vol. II edited byF.El‐Baz andD. M.Warner pp.193–202 NASA SP‐412 Washington D. C. 1979.
  36. Melosh H. J., 1977, Impact and Explosion Cratering, 1245
  37. 10.1029/JB084iB13p07513 · DOI
  38. 10.1029/JB087iB01p00371 · DOI
  39. Moore H. J. C. A.Hodges andD. H.Scott Multiringed basins‐illustrated by Orientale and associated features Proc. Lunar Sci. Conf. 5th 71–100 1974.
  40. Morrison G. G. Morphological features of the Sudbury Crater (abstract) Papers Presented to the Conference on Multi‐ringed Basins: Formation and Evolution 63–64Lunar and Planetary Institute Houston 1980.
  41. 10.1007/BF01259285 · DOI
  42. Mutch T. A., 1972, Geology of the Moon
  43. 10.1029/JZ067i005p01965 · DOI
  44. 10.1080/00206817609471165 · DOI
  45. 10.1029/GL001i007p00291 · DOI
  46. 10.1016/0012-821X(74)90114-9 · DOI
  47. Pike R. J., 1977, Impact and Explosion Cratering, 489
  48. Pike R. J. Control of crater morphology by gravity and target type: Mars earth moon Proc. Lunar Planet. Sci. Conf. 11th 2159–2189 1980.
  49. Pohl J., 1977, Impact and Explosion Cratering, 343
  50. 10.1080/00206817509471590 · DOI
  51. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1965.tb20388.x · DOI
  52. 10.1139/e83-101 · DOI
  53. Roddy D. J., 1968, Shock Metamorphism of Natural Materials, 291
  54. Roddy D. J. Structural deformation at the Flynn Creek impact crater Tennessee: A preliminary report on deep drilling Proc. Lunar Planet. Sci. Conf. 10th 2519–2534 1979.
  55. 10.1029/JB076i023p05414 · DOI
  56. Schmidt R. M., 1984, Lunar and Planetary Science, 722
  57. Schultz P. H., 1978, Lunar and Planetary Science, 1033
  58. 10.1029/JB084iB06p03081 · DOI
  59. Shoemaker E. M., 1962, Physics and Astronomy of the Moon, 283
  60. 10.1146/annurev.ea.11.050183.002333 · DOI
  61. Short N. M., 1972, Thickness of impact crater ejecta on the lunar surface, Mod. Geol., 3, 69
  62. Singer A. V., 1983, Lunar and Planetary Science, 704
  63. Smith E. I., 1973, Fresh lunar craters: morphology as a function of diameter, a possible criterion for crater origin, Mod. Geol., 4, 51
  64. 10.1029/JB089iS01p0C197 · DOI
  65. Strom R. G., 1982, Lunar and Planetary Science, 782
  66. Wilhelms D. E., 1977, Impact and Explosion Cratering, 539
  67. Wilshire H. G. T. W.Offield K. A.Howard D.Cummings Geology of the Sierra Madera cryptoexplosion structure Pecos County Texas U.S. Geol. Surv. Prof. Paper S99‐H 42 Washington D. C. 1972. · DOI
  68. Wood C. A. andJ. W.Head Comparison of impact basins on Mercury Mars and the Moon Proc. Lunar Sci. Conf. 7th 3629–3651 1976.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Croft, S. K.
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth
Published
1985-02-15
Volume
90
Issue
S02
ISSN
0148-0227
Cited by
195
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review