Cited by 58Astro and Planetary SciencePlanetary Science and ExplorationSpace Satellite Systems and Control

The present-day flux of large meteoroids on the lunar surface—A synthesis of models and observational techniques

Oberst, J., Christou, A., Suggs, R., Moser, D., Daubar, I.J., McEwen, A.S., Burchell, M., Kawamura, T. +4 more·2012·Planetary and Space Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pss.2012.10.005

Cites

113 of 113 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Polar regions have the advantages of higher illumination for longer periods and a lower probability of getting hit by meteoroids.

    “Thus, polar regions have the advantages of higher illumination for longer periods and a lower probability of getting hit by meteoroids [27].”
  • The probability of meteoroid fluxes at non-polar lunar latitudes (0°-30°) is higher by 10% compared to polar latitudes (60°-90°).

    “From the limited data collected by spacecraft and radars, it is identified that the probability of meteoroid fluxes at non-polar lunar latitudes (0 ◦ -30 ◦ ) are higher by 10% compared to polar latitudes (60 ◦ -90 ◦ ) [27].”
  • Polar regions are characterized by both high illumination periods and lower meteoroid impacts.

    “Therefore, polar regions are characterized by both high illumination periods and lower meteoroid impacts [22].”

    From Space Microgrids for Future Manned Lunar Bases: A Review (2021) · cites this paper as [22]

  • The probability of meteoroid fluxes at low latitudes (0°-30°) is higher by 10% compared to high latitude (60°-90°).

    “The probability of meteoroid fluxes at low latitudes (0 • -30 • ) are higher by 10% compared to high latitude (60 • -90 • ).”

    From Space Microgrids for Future Manned Lunar Bases: A Review (2021) · cites this paper as [22]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Oberst, J., Christou, A., Suggs, R., Moser, D., Daubar, I. J., McEwen, A. S., Burchell, M., Kawamura, T., Hiesinger, H., Wünnemann, K., Wagner, R., & Robinson, M. S.
Affiliations
  • Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e. V. (DLR) (DE)
  • Armagh Observatory & Planetarium (GB)
  • Marshall Space Flight Center (US)
  • University of Arizona (US)
  • University of Kent (GB)
  • Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JP)
  • University of Münster (DE)
  • Museum für Naturkunde (DE)
  • Arizona State University (US)
Corresponding author
Oberst, J.
Venue
Planetary and Space Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-12
Volume
74
Issue
1
Pages
179-193
ISSN
0032-0633 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2023285570
Cited by
58
References
113
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Planetary and Space Science (publishedVersion)
  • elib (German Aerospace Center) (submittedVersion)
  • Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astro and Planetary Science
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Planetary Science and Exploration
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Space Satellite Systems and Control
Keywords
lunar craters, impact flash, Earth-Moon system

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review