Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 324

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Photometric phase functions of common geologic minerals and applications to quantitative analysis of mineral mixture reflectance spectra

Mustard, John F., Pieters, Carlé M.·1989·Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth

Abstract

Hapke's model for bidirectional reflectance is used to calculate the mass fractional abundance of components in intimately mixed, particulate surfaces from laboratory reflectance spectra. Application of this model, simplified by the assumptions that all surfaces scatter light with the same constant phase function and the opposition surge is negligible, to binary mineral mixtures are summarized and compared with new results for ternary mixtures of olivine, enstatite, and anorthite. These experimental tests indicate that the simple model is accurate to within 7% for mixtures not containing low albedo components (<10% reflectance). However, several observed systematic deviations of the calculated mass fractions from the actual mass fractions suggest that the simple model may be improved by allowing for variable scattering between the minerals used. An empirical scattering function, based on the physically plausible scattering behavior that low albedo materials are backward scattering and high albedo, transparent materials are forward scattering, reduces the magnitude of the systematic deviations in mass fractions observed with the constant scattering model. To determine if the empirical scattering function is representative of the actual scattering behavior of particulate mineral surfaces, specific photometric parameters (single‐scattering albedo, single‐particle phase function) of five different mineral components (olivine, enstatite, anorthite, magnetite, hematite) and two mineral mixtures (90% olivine 10% magnetite, 25% olivine 75% magnetite) are derived from bidirectional reflectance spectra measured at 17 different viewing geometries between 0.5 and 1.6 μm. Mineral components were crushed and wet sieved with ethanol to a 45 to 75 μm particle size. All reflectance data are corrected for the non‐Lambertian scattering properties of halon. Analysis of the parameters of the single‐particle phase function indicate that each mineral defines a relatively unique suite of scattering parameters as a function of albedo. In particular, the silicates are forward scattering where the degree of forward scattering increases with albedo, magnetite is forward scattering but the degree of forward scattering decreases with albedo, and hematite is entirely backward scattering where the degree of backward scattering increases with albedo. It is apparent that the physical properties of the particles (roughness, transparency, shape) rather than albedo or chemical composition determine the gross scattering properties of the particulate surfaces studied here. The scattering parameters of the mixtures are similar to the parameters of the more abundant mineral in the mixture. The experimentally determined single‐scattering albedos are used to calculate the mass fractions of olivine and magnetite in these mixtures. These new fractions are much improved over the previous analyses and indicate that more detailed information regarding the geometric dependence of reflectance overcomes the systematic deficiencies of the simplified methods. In general, the simplified method is appropriate for mixtures not containing low albedo material using bidirectional reflectance measured at intermediate phase angles (20°–40°) and small emergence angles (near 0°). Abundance estimates using this approach are accurate to within 5–10% when information regarding the particle size of the surface components is available, and in a relative sense for surfaces of unknown particle size distributions. More precise abundance estimates can be derived if the scattering properties of the surface are well characterized and incorporated into the analysis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/jb094ib10p13619

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 324

Metadata

Authors
Mustard, J. F., & Pieters, C. M.
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth
Published
1989-10-10
Volume
94
Issue
B10
Pages
13619-13634
ISSN
0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2161170517
Cited by
324
References
1
FWCI
7.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Photometric phase functions of common geologic minerals and applications to quantitative analysis of mineral mixture reflectance spectra. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/jb094ib10p13619
The paper
Mustard, J. F., & Pieters, C. M. (1989). Photometric phase functions of common geologic minerals and applications to quantitative analysis of mineral mixture reflectance spectra. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth. https://doi.org/10.1029/jb094ib10p13619

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.