The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Tropospheric chemistry: A global perspective
Open accessAbstract
A model for the photochemistry of the global troposphere constrained by observed concentrations of H 2 O, O 3, CO, CH 4, NO, NO 2, and HNO 3 is presented. Data for NO and NO 2 are insufficient to define the global distribution of these gases but are nonetheless useful in limiting several of the more uncertain parameters of the model. Concentrations of OH, HO 2, H 2 O 2, NO, NO 2, NO 3, N 2 O 5, HNO 2, HO 2 NO 2, CH 3 O 2, CH 3 OOH, CH 2 O, and CH 3 CCl 3 are calculated as functions of altitude, latitude, and season. Results imply that the source for nitrogen oxides in the remote troposphere is geographically dispersed and surprisingly small, less than 10 7 tons N yr−1. Global sources for CO and CH 4 are 1.5 × 10 9 tons C yr−1 and 4.5 × 10 8 tons C yr−1, respectively. Carbon monoxide is derived from combustion of fossil fuel (15%) and oxidation of atmospheric CH 4(25%), with the balance from burning of vegetation and oxidation of biospheric hydrocarbons. Production of CO in the northern hemisphere exceeds that in the southern hemisphere by about a factor of 2. Industrial and agricultural activities provide approximately half the global source of CO. Oxidation of CO and CH 4 provides sources of tropospheric O 3 similar in magnitude to loss by in situ photochemistry. Observations of CH 3 CCl 3 could offer an important check of the tropospheric model and results shown here suggest that computed concentrations of OH should be reliable within a factor of 2. A more definitive test requires better definition of release rates for CH 3 CCl 3 and improved measurements for its distribution in the atmosphere.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Agricultural Systems of the World: An Evolutionary Approach
Grigg, D. B. (1974) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511665882 · Cited by 248
Cited by
A large atomic chlorine source inferred from mid-continental reactive nitrogen chemistry
Thornton, J. A., Kercher, J. P., Riedel, T. P., Wagner, N. L., Cozic, J., Holloway, J. S., Dubé, W. P., Wolfe, G. M., Quinn, P. K., Middlebrook, A. M., et al. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08905 · Cited by 652
Radiative forcing of climate by changes in the vertical distribution of ozone
Lacis, A. A., Wuebbles, D. J., & Logan, J. A. (1990) · Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/jd095id07p09971 · Cited by 556
Surface ozone depletion in Arctic spring sustained by bromine reactions on aerosols
Fan, S.-M., & Jacob, D. J. (1992) · Nature · doi:10.1038/359522a0 · Cited by 448
Analysis of present-day and future OH and methane lifetime in the ACCMIP simulations
Voulgarakis, A., Naik, V., Lamarque, J.-F., Shindell, D. T., Young, P. J., Prather, M. J., Wild, O., Field, R. D., Bergmann, D., Cameron-Smith, P., et al. (2013) · Atmospheric chemistry and physics · doi:10.5194/acp-13-2563-2013 · Cited by 324
Tropospheric chemical composition measurements in Brazil during the dry season
Crutzen, P. J., Delany, A. C., Greenberg, J., Haagenson, P., Heidt, L., Lueb, R., Pollock, W., Seiler, W., Wartburg, A., & Zimmerman, P. (1985) · Journal of Atmospheric Chemistry · doi:10.1007/bf00051075 · Cited by 384
Metadata
- Authors
- Logan, J. A., Prather, M. J., Wofsy, S. C., & McElroy, M. B.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1981-08-20
- Volume
- 86
- Issue
- C8
- Pages
- 7210-7254
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2059006576
- Cited by
- 1,888
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 46.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Tropospheric chemistry: A global perspective. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/jc086ic08p07210
- The paper
- Logan, J. A., Prather, M. J., Wofsy, S. C., & McElroy, M. B. (1981). Tropospheric chemistry: A global perspective. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans. https://doi.org/10.1029/jc086ic08p07210
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.