Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 198

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Drifter observations of coastal surface currents during CODE: The statistical and dynamical views

Davis, Russ E.·1985·Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans

Abstract

Observations of near‐surface coastal currents were made off the Northern California coast during CODE by using 164 current‐following drifters. These observations are used to describe the two‐dimensional structure of the mean surface flow and the scales of its variability. The mean flow is a broad equatorward current, strongly sheared only within 10 km of the shore, and a mean offshore flow producing an average divergence ∇H·u ≈ 3 × 10−6 s−1. Divergence is uniformly distributed across the shelf, but variation of the alongshore flow causes an upwelling center near Point Arena. The spatial correlation scale is less than 40 km in both the alongshore and across‐shelf directions, even though 55% of the surface kinetic energy is described by a single mode with gradual across‐shelf variation and an alongshore wavelength of the order 200 km. The surface flow is well correlated with flow at 30‐m depth. The Lagrangian time scale (≈1.5 day) is significantly shorter than the Eulerian time scale (≈5 days), indicating that the flow is dominated by highly nonlinear quasi‐stationary eddies. Drifter displacements indicate that the mean lateral eddy transport of passive scalars can be described by an anisotropic and inhomogeneous eddy diffusivity, but this diffusivity cannot be used to relate eddy Reynolds stresses and the mean shear. Analysis of two‐particle separations, which determine the size of dispersing property clouds, shows that dispersal cannot be described by a scale‐dependent diffusivity and indicates the importance of small‐scale convergences in retarding dispersal. Over the entire 100‐km by 50‐km region the surface layer heat budget is dominated by upwelling cooling and surface heating, with onshore eddy heat flux playing a smaller role. Substantial convergence of the alongshore eddy heat flux is apparently required to balance upwelling cooling in the upwelling center. Drifters are found to have a Lagrangian mean acceleration caused by eddy processes. Analysis of this acceleration and of the horizontal flow contributions to the eddy Reynolds stress allows examination of the importance of eddy processes in the mean momentum budget. While the alongshore flow must be in approximate geostrophic balance, there is a clear pattern to the eddy forcing, which appears to be important in the alongshore momentum equation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/jc090ic03p04756

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 198

Metadata

Authors
Davis, R. E.
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans
Published
1985-05-20
Volume
90
Issue
C3
Pages
4756-4772
ISSN
0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2008453878
Cited by
198
References
0
FWCI
8.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Drifter observations of coastal surface currents during CODE: The statistical and dynamical views. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/jc090ic03p04756
The paper
Davis, R. E. (1985). Drifter observations of coastal surface currents during CODE: The statistical and dynamical views. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans. https://doi.org/10.1029/jc090ic03p04756

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.