Cited by 59Oceanographic and Atmospheric ProcessesMeteorological Phenomena and SimulationsFluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows

Stability of a coastal upwelling front: 2. Model results and comparison with observations

Barth, J. A.·1989·Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans

Abstract

A two‐layer shallow water equation model is used to investigate the linear stability of a coastal upwelling front. The model features a surface front parallel to a coastal boundary and bottom topography which is an arbitrary function of the cross‐shelf coordinate. The existence of unstable waves on the model coastal upwelling front, as suggested by the general stability theorem developed in a companion paper, is confirmed by solving directly the linearized equations of motion. The unstable wave motions are frontally trapped and dominant in the upper layer. The wave propagates phase in the direction of the basic state flow, and the primary energy conversion is via baroclinic instability. The effect of varying the model parameters is presented. Moving the front closer than ∼2 Rossby radii to the coastal boundary results in a decrease in the growth rate of the fastest growing wave. Increasing the overall vertical shear of the basic state flow, by either decreasing the lower layer depth or increasing the steepness of the interface, results in an increase in the growth of the fastest growing wave. A bottom sloping in the same sense as the interface results in a decrease of the growth rates and alongfront wave numbers of the unstable waves in the system. Linearized bottom friction is included in the stability model and results in a decrease in the growth rates of the unstable waves by extracting energy from the system. Since the unstable mode is strongest in the upper layer, bottom…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/jc094ic08p10857

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Phytoplankton and zooplankton would be transported more rapidly toward convergent offshore frontal systems, which themselves may be forced further offshore.

    “Phytoplankton and zooplankton would be transported more rapidly toward convergent offshore frontal systems, which themselves may be forced further offshore (Figs.1b, c and 2) [3,34,35].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barth, J. A.
Corresponding author
Barth, J. A.
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans
Published
1989-08-15
Volume
94
Issue
C8
Pages
10857-10883
ISSN
0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2090569459
Cited by
59
References
0
Citations by year
2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres (publishedVersion)
Funders
Curtin University of Technology
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
Keywords
linear stability, baroclinic instability, two-layer shallow water model, bathymetry, vertical shear, bottom friction, Rossby radius, coastal upwelling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review