Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 703

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Redfield ratio based on chemical data from isopycnal surfaces

Takahashi, Taro, Broecker, Wallace S., Langer, Sara·1985·Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans

Abstract

The composition of the organic matter oxidized within the thermocline of the Atlantic and Indian oceans has been estimated from the chemical data along the σ θ 27.0 and 27.2 horizons. These estimates are based on the differences between the preformed and observed concentrations of PO 4, NO 3, total inorganic CO 2, alkalinity, and O 2. Since these isopycnal horizons are ventilated both from the north and the south, the preformed concentration estimates take into account the relative contributions of these two end‐members. The proportions of these end‐members are estimated on the basis of the potential temperature of the water, assuming that no cross‐isopycnal mixing occurred. Except for the northern Indian Ocean, the composition of the waters entering the isopycnal horizons is established through linear extrapolation of the property‐oxygen trends to oxygen saturation. The σ θ 27.0 and 27.2 waters do not outcrop in the northern Indian Ocean, and these horizons receive waters spilling into the Indian Ocean from the Red Sea. Therefore the composition of the Red Sea overflow water with these densities is taken to be the northern Indian end‐member. The results of this study indicate that the accepted Redfield P:N:C: −O 2 ratio of 1:16:106:138 requires revision. Our analysis yields a ratio of 1:16:103:172 if the carbon value is represented by the observed increase in the total CO 2 concentration. On the other hand, if the carbon value is assumed to be represented by the oxygen utilization minus the oxygen used for oxidation of NH 3 with two moles of O 2 per nitrogen atom, a ratio of 1:16:140:172 is obtained. Thus the P: −O 2 ratio lies between 1:103 and 1:140. This discrepancy may be accounted for by the increased CO 2 concentrations in the source waters as a result of the uptake of anthropogenic CO 2 or by an excess demand of oxygen for oxidation of hydrogenated organic molecules. Therefore, without a firm knowledge of either the corrections for the anthropogenic CO 2 effect or the hydrogen content of the biological residues, the true P:C ratio cannot be obtained. The ratio of P:CaCO 3 dissolution has been estimated to be about 1:12. This indicates that the CO 2 produced by the oxidation of organic carbon to that derived from the dissolution of CaCO 3 is bout 10:1 at these density horizons.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/jc090ic04p06907

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 703

Metadata

Authors
Takahashi, T., Broecker, W. S., & Langer, S.
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans
Published
1985-07-20
Volume
90
Issue
C4
Pages
6907-6924
ISSN
0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2030098873
Cited by
703
References
0
FWCI
18.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Redfield ratio based on chemical data from isopycnal surfaces. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/jc090ic04p06907
The paper
Takahashi, T., Broecker, W. S., & Langer, S. (1985). Redfield ratio based on chemical data from isopycnal surfaces. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans. https://doi.org/10.1029/jc090ic04p06907

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.