Cited by 95Oceanographic and Atmospheric ProcessesOcean Waves and Remote SensingMeteorological Phenomena and Simulations

Tropical Atlantic Geostrophic Currents and Ship Drifts

·1987·Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans

Abstract

Historical ship drifts and geostrophic surface currents obtained from hydrographic data are compared in the tropical Atlantic Ocean. The major components of the current system (North Equatorial Current, North Equatorial Countercurrent, South Equatorial Current) are clearly depicted by the two data sets. The main difference between the two fields is the weakness of the geostrophic currents except in the near‐equatorial band, where on the contrary, they are much larger than the ship drifts. The amplitudes of the annual signals differ, but the phases are in rather good agreement. The uncertainty concerning the ship drift data, and the limitation of the geostrophic assumption, can explain a part of the differences encountered in this study. A much better comparison is obtained if we add to the geostrophic current ug an Ekman drift current ue computed from the climatological wind stress and a mean constant vertical viscosity value. Then the total velocity u = ug + ue corresponds very closely in phase and amplitude to the ship drift velocity, except at the equator.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/jc092ic05p05076

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Bubnov V. A., 1977, Investigation of the large scale current structure in the tropical Atlantic Ocean along 23*deg;30′W, Oceanology, 17, 631
  2. Crawford W. R., 1979, Energetics of the Atlantic equatorial currents, Deep Sea Res., 26, 309
  3. Defant A., 1941, Quantitative Untersuchungen zur Statik und Dynamik des Atlantischen Ozeans, Meteor Exped., 6, 190
  4. 10.1175/1520-0485(1983)013<1093:NMWSOT>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  5. Hisard P., 1973, Variations saisonnierès à l'équateur dans le Golfe de Guinée, Cah. ORSTOM, Ser. Oceanogr., 12, 349
  6. 10.1175/1520-0485(1983)013<2070:SVOTST>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  7. Lemasson L., 1973, Circulation dans le Golfe de Guinée, Etude de la région d'origine du sous courant ivoirien, Cah. ORSTOM, Ser. Oceanogr., 11, 303
  8. Neumann G., 1968, Ocean Currents
  9. Pond S., 1978, Introductory Dynamic Oceanography
  10. Schumacher A., 1940, Monatskarten der Oberflachenstromungen im Nordatlantischen Ozean (5°S‐50°N), Ann. Hydrogr. Mar. Meteorol., 68, 109
  11. Schumacher A., 1943, Monatskarten der Oberflachenstromungen im aquatorialen und sudlichen Atlantischen Ozean, Ann. Hydrogr. Mar. Meteorol., 71, 209

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans
Published
1987-05-15
Volume
92
Issue
C5
Pages
5076-5088
ISSN
0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2144914834
Cited by
95
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
FWCI
3.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Ocean Waves and Remote Sensing
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
Keywords
tropical Atlantic, geostrophic currents, ship drift, North Equatorial Current, North Equatorial Countercurrent, South Equatorial Current, Ekman drift, wind stress, vertical viscosity, equatorial currents, seasonal variation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review