The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Optical modeling of the upper ocean in relation to its biogenous matter content (case I waters)
Open accessAbstract
The aim of the present study is to review and tentatively to interpret the optical behavior of oceanic case I waters, those waters for which phytoplankton and their derivative play a predominant role in determining their optical properties. Chlorophyll‐like pigment concentration is used as the index to quantify the algal material (living and detrital), and statistical relationships between this index and the depth of the euphotic layer, the spectral values of the attenuation coefficient for downwelling irradiance, or the scattering coefficient are investigated. On the basis of these statistical relationships a pigment‐dependent optical model is developed. It allows the propagation of the visible radiant energy within the ocean or the backscattered radiation from the upper layer to be predicted as a function of the local phytoplanktonic content. Other geophysical or geochemical applications are derived which concern the heating rate due to penetrating visible radiations or the rate of energy storage due to photosynthesis. The nonlinear trends observed in the algal biomass‐attenuation relationships are analyzed by (1) considering the rather regular change of the living‐to‐detrital organic carbon ratio which seems to occur in oceanic waters ranging from oligotrophic to eutrophic, and (2) accounting for the respective contributions of absorption (by pigmented cells) and of scattering (by all kind of particulates) in the attenuation process of radiant energy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The MERIS Case 2 water algorithm
Doerffer, R., & Schiller, H. (2007) · International Journal of Remote Sensing · doi:10.1080/01431160600821127 · Cited by 549
Polovina, J. J., Mitchum, G. T., & Evans, G. T. (1995) · Deep Sea Research Part I: Oceanographic Research Papers · doi:10.1016/0967-0637(95)00075-h · Cited by 332
Seasonal mixed layer heat budget of the tropical Atlantic Ocean
Foltz, G. R., Grodsky, S. A., Carton, J. A., & McPhaden, M. J. (2003) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans · doi:10.1029/2002jc001584 · Cited by 189
Cannizzaro, J. P., Carder, K. L., Chen, F. R., Heil, C. A., & Vargo, G. A. (2008) · Continental Shelf Research · doi:10.1016/j.csr.2004.04.007 · Cited by 170
HABNet: Machine Learning, Remote Sensing-Based Detection of Harmful Algal Blooms
Hill, P. R., Kumar, A., Temimi, M., & Bull, D. R. (2020) · IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/jstars.2020.3001445 · Cited by 143
Metadata
- Authors
- Morel, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1988-09-15
- Volume
- 93
- Issue
- C9
- Pages
- 10749-10768
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2155005486
- Cited by
- 1,419
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Optical modeling of the upper ocean in relation to its biogenous matter content (case I waters). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/jc093ic09p10749
- The paper
- Morel, A. (1988). Optical modeling of the upper ocean in relation to its biogenous matter content (case I waters). Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans. https://doi.org/10.1029/jc093ic09p10749
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.