The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Sulfur dioxide in remote oceanic air: Cloud transport of reactive precursors
Abstract
Reactive surface emissions of reduced sulfur gases can produce SO 2 in the middle and upper troposphere at the levels of 80±30 pptv measured high over the remote oceans. We present simulations with a two‐dimensional “Staubsauger” or “vacuum cleaner” model that combines a photochemical model with a description of vertical transport of trace species by convective clouds within larger synoptic circulations. Emissions of 20–60 Tg (S)/yr of (CH 3)2 S, H 2 S, or CS 2, may produce the observed SO 2. Roughly equal production rates of SO 2 and methane sulfonic acid may be expected. The amount and exact vertical distribution of the SO 2 produced remain uncertain: the greatest chemical uncertainties are the reaction yield of SO 2 expectable under clean tropospheric conditions and also the liquid‐phase removal of SO 2, and the oxidation rate. The amount of upper tropospheric SO 2 produced depends substantially on the proximity of strong reduced S sources to regions of active convection. However, the character of the solutions we present is invariably distinctly different from those obtained with one‐ or two‐dimensional models employing the eddy‐diffusion hypothesis. The results of the model point beyond its original conception, and stress the likely importance of the rainy tropical jungles and mid‐latitude industrial regions, since both regions have large sulfur emissions arid frequently active cumulonimbus convection. This process, however, should contribute mainly to upper‐tropospheric SO 2. Other chemical implications are that tropospheric OH may depend critically on HOOH levels as well as the hydrocarbon and nitrogen oxide cycles. Cloud transport may play an important role in these cycles. The hydroxyl radical concentration depends as much on assumptions regarding HOOH reaction and transport as it does on NO levels.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Madronich, S. (1987) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/jd092id08p09740 · Cited by 804
The global lightning-induced nitrogen oxides source
Schumann, U., & Huntrieser, H. (2007) · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.5194/acp-7-3823-2007 · Cited by 708
Atmospheric processing of organic aerosols
Ellison, G. B., Tuck, A. F., & Vaida, V. (1999) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/1999jd900073 · Cited by 448
Formation and cycling of aerosols in the global troposphere
Raes, F., Dingenen, R. V., Vignati, E., Wilson, J., Putaud, J.-P., Seinfeld, J. H., & Adams, P. (2000) · Atmospheric Environment · doi:10.1016/s1352-2310(00)00239-9 · Cited by 437
Balkanski, Y. J., Jacob, D. J., Gardner, G. M., Graustein, W. C., & Turekian, K. K. (1993) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/93jd02456 · Cited by 353
Metadata
- Authors
- Chatfield, R. B., & Crutzen, P. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1984-08-20
- Volume
- 89
- Issue
- D5
- Pages
- 7111-7132
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2124827694
- Cited by
- 315
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sulfur dioxide in remote oceanic air: Cloud transport of reactive precursors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/jd089id05p07111
- The paper
- Chatfield, R. B., & Crutzen, P. J. (1984). Sulfur dioxide in remote oceanic air: Cloud transport of reactive precursors. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/jd089id05p07111
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.