Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 804

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Photodissociation in the atmosphere: 1. Actinic flux and the effects of ground reflections and clouds

Madronich, Sasha·1987·Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres

Abstract

The actinic flux must be distinguished from other radiometric quantities such as the irradiance. This distinction shows that (1) a fraction of the recent atmospheric chemistry literature contains improperly calculated rates of photodissociation, and (2) photodissociation rate coefficients inside clouds, and particularly inside cloud droplets, can frequently exceed the clear‐sky values, in contrast to current usage in cloud chemistry models. Both of these findings are traceable to the ∼2 cos θ factor incurred in the actinic flux (but not in the irradiance) when the solar beam is scattered and diffused into nearly isotropic light.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/jd092id08p09740

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 37 references

Cited by

See all 804

Metadata

Authors
Madronich, S.
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
Published
1987-08-20
Volume
92
Issue
D8
Pages
9740-9752
ISSN
0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2153160115
Cited by
804
References
37
FWCI
8.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Photodissociation in the atmosphere: 1. Actinic flux and the effects of ground reflections and clouds. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/jd092id08p09740
The paper
Madronich, S. (1987). Photodissociation in the atmosphere: 1. Actinic flux and the effects of ground reflections and clouds. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/jd092id08p09740

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.