Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 828

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Trace gas trends and their potential role in climate change

Open access
Ramanathan, V., Cicerone, R. J., Singh, H. B., Kiehl, J. T.·1985·Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres

Abstract

This study examines the potential climatic effects of the radiatively active trace gases that have been detected in the atmosphere including chlorofluorocarbons, chlorocarbons, hydrocarbons, fluorinated and brominated species, and other compounds of nitrogen and sulfur, in addition to CO 2 and O 3. A one‐dimensional radiative‐convective model is used to estimate trace gas effects on atmospheric and surface temperatures for three cases: (1) modern day (1980) observed concentrations are adopted and their present trends are extrapolated 50 years into the future. These projections are based on analyses of observed trends and atmospheric residence times; (2) the preindustrial to present increase in CO 2 and other trace gases are inferred from available observations; (3) a hypothetical increase of 0–1 ppbv is considered to provide insights into the radiative processes. Trace gases other than CO 2 are shown to be potentially as important as CO 2 for long‐term climate trends. The relative importance of the 30 or so trace gases included in this study depends on the problem under consideration. The inferred CO 2 increase from preindustrial to the present causes an equilibrium warming of the model surface by 0.5 K, which is amplified by 50% by CH 4, CFCl 3 (F11), CF 2 Cl 2 (F12), and tropospheric ozone. For the projected increase from year 1980 to 2030, the other trace gases amplify the estimated CO 2 warming of 0.7 K by about 110%: CFCl 3, CF 2 Cl 2, ozone, and CH 4 each contribute in the 0.1–0.2 K range followed by N 2 O, CHClF 2 (F22), CH 3 CCl 3, and CCl 4 in the 0.03–0.1 K range. Finally, on a per ppb basis, about 12 trace gases are identified to be important: CBrF 3, C 2 F 6 (F116), CHF 3, and CF 3 Cl (F13) have greenhouse effects comparable to those of CFCl 3 (F11) and CF 2 Cl 2 (F12). The narrow‐band overlap treatment and the accurate spectral and angular integration techniques employed in the present radiation model enable quantitative interpretation of the differences between various published estimates for the greenhouse effects of CFCl 3 and CF 2 Cl 2. For the projected trace gas increase, we compute the stratospheric O 3 change by employing a photochemical model coupled to the radiative‐convective model. The O 3 change cools the stratosphere and the magnitude of the cooling is as large as that due to the projected CO 2 increase. Because of the O 3‐induced stratospheric cooling and the surface warming due to the greenhouse effect, the trace gas effects on climate are virtually indistinguishable from those of CO 2.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/jd090id03p05547

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 828

Metadata

Authors
Ramanathan, V., Cicerone, R. J., Singh, H. B., & Kiehl, J. T.
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
Published
1985-06-20
Volume
90
Issue
D3
Pages
5547-5566
ISSN
0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2020965636
Cited by
828
References
0
FWCI
96.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Trace gas trends and their potential role in climate change. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/jd090id03p05547
The paper
Ramanathan, V., Cicerone, R. J., Singh, H. B., & Kiehl, J. T. (1985). Trace gas trends and their potential role in climate change. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/jd090id03p05547

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.