Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 812

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Sea‐salt corrections and interpretation of constituent ratios in marine precipitation

Keene, William C., Pszenny, Alexander A. P., Galloway, James N., Hawley, Mark E.·1986·Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres

Abstract

Differentiation of sea‐salt and non‐sea‐salt (or excess) components is essential for many studies of marine aerosol and precipitation chemistry. Uncertainties in such calculations arise from (1) uncertainties in the composition of seawater, (2) analytical uncertainties, (3) the amount of dry deposited sea salt in samples, (4) the validity of assuming a purely marine source for the sea‐salt reference species, and (5) the validity of assuming no fractionation during or after production of sea‐salt aerosols. We assessed these uncertainties, and, using the reduced major axis regression technique, evaluated these assumptions by analyzing the composition of precipitation at Amsterdam Island (38°S, 78°E) and at Bermuda (32°N, 65°W). Precipitation on Amsterdam Island contained significant excess concentrations of Na+ (2%) and Cl− (5%) relative to Mg 2+. Indirect evidence indicates that these departures from seawater ratios are probably not due to the influence of terrestrial material. The excess Cl− was sufficient to account for approximately 20% of free acidity, suggesting that scavenging of vapor phase HCl may affect the acid‐base chemistry of precipitation at the site. Volume‐weighted excess SO 42− based on Na+ and Mg 2+ differed by 11%, a nonnegligible source of bias in estimating the wet deposition of non‐sea‐salt sulfur. Precipitation on Bermuda contained significant concentrations of locally derived alkali and alkaline earth metals. The influence of continental and non‐sea‐salt marine sources on concentrations of excess SO 42− was also evident. These observations suggest that assumptions involved in sea‐salt corrections are not always satisfied and that it is therefore necessary to evaluate individual data sets, using objective criteria, to select the appropriate reference species.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/jd091id06p06647

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 812

Metadata

Authors
Keene, W. C., Pszenny, A. A. P., Galloway, J. N., & Hawley, M. E.
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
Published
1986-05-20
Volume
91
Issue
D6
Pages
6647-6658
ISSN
0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2119903004
Cited by
812
References
0
FWCI
11.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sea‐salt corrections and interpretation of constituent ratios in marine precipitation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/jd091id06p06647
The paper
Keene, W. C., Pszenny, A. A. P., Galloway, J. N., & Hawley, M. E. (1986). Sea‐salt corrections and interpretation of constituent ratios in marine precipitation. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/jd091id06p06647

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.