The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Ozone destruction through heterogeneous chemistry following the eruption of El Chichón
Abstract
It is now well established that heterogeneous reactions provide an important mechanism for Antarctic ozone depletion. Recent laboratory studies suggest that the same reactions that occur on HNO 3/H 2 O ice clouds in the cold Antarctic stratosphere can also take place on sulfuric acid particles (e.g., volcanic and background aerosols) typical of lower latitudes, albeit at slower rates. The reduction in stratospheric ozone observed at northern mid‐latitudes in late 1982 through 1983 following the volcanic eruption of El Chichón is investigated in terms of ozone loss through heterogeneous chemistry on the aerosol which formed in the stratosphere. The rates of the relevant heterogeneous reactions are believed to be critically dependent on (1) the aerosol surface area density and (2) the percent by weight sulfuric acid in the liquid particles. Direct measurements of both of these important quantities for El Chichón aerosol are described and used as a basis for model calculations of their possible effects on ozone and other trace species. The observed volcanic particle surface area reached a maximum at mid‐latitudes of about 50 μm 2 cm−3(above a typical background value of about 0.75) at an altitude of 18–20 km in early 1983. This enhancement of surface area is about the same as that encountered in stratospheric clouds in the Antarctic, suggesting a possible basis for ozone depletion through heterogeneous chemistry. Observations of NO 2 and HNO 3 also suggest that heterogeneous reactions on both background and volcanic aerosol play a significant role in partitioning reactive nitrogen species in middle and high latitudes in winter. It is shown that heterogeneous reactions similar to those occurring in Antarctica may have been responsible for at least a portion of the anomalous ozone reduction observed at mid‐latitudes in early 1983.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Stratospheric ozone depletion: A review of concepts and history
Solomon, S. (1999) · Reviews of Geophysics · doi:10.1029/1999rg900008 · Cited by 2,008
Self-citationAlbedo enhancement by stratospheric sulfur injections: a contribution to resolve a policy dilemma?
Crutzen, P. J. (2006) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-006-9101-y · Cited by 1,541
Changes in biologically active ultraviolet radiation reaching the Earth's surface
Madronich, S., McKenzie, R. L., Björn, L. O., & Caldwell, M. M. (1998) · Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology · doi:10.1016/s1011-1344(98)00182-1 · Cited by 1,086
Zielinski, G. A., Mayewski, P. A., Meeker, L. D., Whitlow, S., Twickler, M. S., Morrison, M., Meese, D. A., Gow, A. J., & Alley, R. B. (1994) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.264.5161.948 · Cited by 476
Staehelin, J., Harris, N. R. P., Appenzeller, C., & Eberhard, J. (2001) · Reviews of Geophysics · doi:10.1029/1999rg000059 · Cited by 375
Metadata
- Authors
- Hofmann, D. J., & Solomon, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1989-04-20
- Volume
- 94
- Issue
- D4
- Pages
- 5029-5041
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2003266253
- Cited by
- 572
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 34.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ozone destruction through heterogeneous chemistry following the eruption of El Chichón. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/jd094id04p05029
- The paper
- Hofmann, D. J., & Solomon, S. (1989). Ozone destruction through heterogeneous chemistry following the eruption of El Chichón. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/jd094id04p05029
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.