The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Characterization and error analysis of profiles retrieved from remote sounding measurements
Abstract
The characterization and error analysis of profiles retrieved from remote measurements present conceptual problems, particularly concerning interlevel correlations between errors, the smoothing effect of remote sounding and the contribution of a priori information to profile. A formal analysis for profile retrieval is developed which is independent of the nature of the retrieval method, provided that the measurement process can be characterized adequately. The relationship between the retrieved and true profiles is expressed in terms of a smoothing function which can be straightforwardly calculated. The retrieval error separates naturally into three components, (1) random error due to measurement noise, (2) systematic error due to uncertain model parameters and inverse model bias, and (3) null‐space error due to the inherent finite vertical resolution of the observing system. A recipe is given for evaluating each of the components in any particular case. Most of the error terms appear as covariance matrices, rather than simple error variances. These matrices can be interpreted in terms of “error patterns”, which are statistically independent contributions to the total error. They are the multidimensional equivalent of “error bars”. An approach is described which clarifies the relation of a priori data to the retrieved profile, and identifies a priori in cases where it is not an explicit part of the retrieval.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Retrieval of atmospheric temperature and composition from remote measurements of thermal radiation
Rodgers, C. D. (1976) · Reviews of Geophysics · doi:10.1029/rg014i004p00609 · Cited by 1,464
Self-citationUniqueness in the inversion of inaccurate gross Earth data
Backus, G., & Gilbert, F. (1970) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences · doi:10.1098/rsta.1970.0005 · Cited by 1,336
The Solar Backscatter Ultraviolet and Total Ozone Mapping Spectrometer (SBUV/TOMS) for NIMBUS G
Heath, D., Krueger, A. J., Roeder, H. A., et al. (1975) · Optical Engineering · doi:10.1117/12.7971839 · Cited by 360
Cited by
The Halogen Occultation Experiment
Russell, J. M., Gordley, L. L., Park, J. H., Drayson, S. R., Hesketh, W. D., Cicerone, R. J., Tuck, A. F., Frederick, J. E., Harries, J. E., & Crutzen, P. J. (1993) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/93jd00799 · Cited by 871
ARTS, the atmospheric radiative transfer simulator
Buehler, S. A., Eriksson, P., Kuhn, T., von Engeln, A., & Verdes, C. (2005) · Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer · doi:10.1016/j.jqsrt.2004.05.051 · Cited by 279
Frieß, U., Monks, P. S., Remedios, J. J., Rozanov, A., Sinreich, R., Wagner, T., & Platt, U. (2006) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/2005jd006618 · Cited by 269
Retrievals of sea surface temperature from infrared imagery: origin and form of systematic errors
Merchant, C. J., Horrocks, L. A., Eyre, J. R., & O'carroll, A. G. (2006) · Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society · doi:10.1256/qj.05.143 · Cited by 43
Mertens, C. J., Slaba, T. C., & Hu, S. (2018) · Space Weather · doi:10.1029/2018sw001971 · Cited by 28
Metadata
- Authors
- Rodgers, C. D.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1990-04-20
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- D5
- Pages
- 5587-5595
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2113048819
- Cited by
- 697
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 8.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Characterization and error analysis of profiles retrieved from remote sounding measurements. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/jd095id05p05587
- The paper
- Rodgers, C. D. (1990). Characterization and error analysis of profiles retrieved from remote sounding measurements. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/jd095id05p05587
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.