The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Uniqueness in the inversion of inaccurate gross Earth data
Abstract
A gross Earth datum is a single measurable number describing some property of the whole Earth, such as mass, moment of inertia, or the frequency of oscillation of some identified elastic-gravitational normal mode. We suppose that a finite set G of gross Earth data has been measured, that the measurements are inaccurate, and that the variance matrix of the errors of measurement can be estimated. We show that some such sets G of measurements determine the structure of the Earth within certain limits of error except for fine-scale detail. That is, from some setsG it is possible to compute localized averages of the Earth structure at various depths. These localized averages will be slightly in error, and their errors will be larger as their resolving lengths are shortened. We show how to determine whether a given set G of measured gross Earth data permits such a construction of localized averages, and, if so, how to find the shortest length scale over which G gives a local average structure at a particular depth if the variance of the error in computing that local average from G is to be less than a specified amount. We apply the general theory to the linear problem of finding the depth variation of a frequency-independent local elastic dissipation (Q) from the observed damping rates of a finite number of normal modes. We also apply the theory to the nonlinear problem of finding density against depth from the total mass, moment and normal-mode frequencies, in case the compressional and shear velocities are known.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Four centuries of geomagnetic secular variation from historical records
Jackson, A., Jonkers, A. R. T., & Walker, M. R. (2000) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rsta.2000.0569 · Cited by 1,085
Wiggins, R. A. (1972) · Reviews of Geophysics · doi:10.1029/rg010i001p00251 · Cited by 760
The NEMESIS planetary atmosphere radiative transfer and retrieval tool
Irwin, P. G. J., Teanby, N. A., de Kok, R., Fletcher, L. N., Howett, C. J. A., Tsang, C. C. C., Wilson, C. F., Calcutt, S. B., Nixon, C. A., & Parrish, P. D. (2008) · Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer · doi:10.1016/j.jqsrt.2007.11.006 · Cited by 536
Liu, A. K., Belliveau, J. W., & Dale, A. M. (1998) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.95.15.8945 · Cited by 384
Theoretical background for the inversion of seismic waveforms including elasticity and attenuation
Tarantola, A. (1988) · pure and applied geophysics · doi:10.1007/bf01772605 · Cited by 334
Metadata
- Authors
- Backus, G., & Gilbert, F.
- Venue
- Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 1970-03-05
- Volume
- 266
- Issue
- 1173
- Pages
- 123-192
- ISSN
- 0080-4614 (ISSN-L)
- 2054-0272
- OpenAlex
- W1999070203
- Cited by
- 1,336
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Uniqueness in the inversion of inaccurate gross Earth data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1098/rsta.1970.0005
- The paper
- Backus, G., & Gilbert, F. (1970). Uniqueness in the inversion of inaccurate gross Earth data. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.1970.0005
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.