Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 376

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Potential evapotranspiration and the likelihood of future drought

Rind, D., Goldberg, R., Hansen, J., Rosenzweig, C., Ruedy, R.·1990·Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres

Abstract

The likelihood of future drought is studied on the basis of two drought indices calculated from the Goddard Institute for Space Studies general circulation model (GISS GCM) transient and doubled CO 2 climate changes. We use the Palmer drought severity index (PDSI) and a new supply‐demand index (SDDI), the latter being the difference between the precipitation and potential evapotranspiration Ep, i.e., the difference between atmospheric supply of and demand for moisture. Both indices show increasing drought for the United States during the next century, with effects becoming apparent in the 1990s. If greenhouse gas emissions continue to increase rapidly, the model results suggest that severe drought (5% frequency today) will occur about 50% of the time by the 2050s. The results are driven by the large increase in E P, associated with the simulated climate warming. E P increases most where the temperature is highest, at low to mid‐latitudes, while precipitation increases most where the air is coolest and easiest to saturate by the additional moisture, at higher latitudes. Thus atmospheric demand becomes greater than supply for most of the globe by the latter half of next century. We show that large E P changes can lead to soil moisture deficits, as in the PDSI hydrologic budget, and vegetation desiccation, as is implied by vegetation and climate models. We suggest that drought intensification has been understated in most GCM simulations, including the GISS GCM, because of their lack of realistic land surface models. Paleoclimate analogues in the Mesozoic and Cenozoic are reviewed which imply that arid conditions can result from either increased temperatures or decreased precipitation, consistent with our use of the SDDI. The results depend primarily on the temperature increase, in particular the model sensitivity of 4°C warming for doubled CO 2. Global precipitation cannot keep pace with increased demand over land because the land surface warms more than the ocean surface; this effect, along with greater atmospheric opacity, reduces low level gradients and evaporation from the ocean. If the forecast temperature changes come to pass, these conclusions suggest that drought conditions will increase dramatically.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/jd095id07p09983

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 376

Metadata

Authors
Rind, D., Goldberg, R., Hansen, J., Rosenzweig, C., & Ruedy, R.
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
Published
1990-06-20
Volume
95
Issue
D7
Pages
9983-10004
ISSN
0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2162922866
Cited by
376
References
0
FWCI
25.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Potential evapotranspiration and the likelihood of future drought. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/jd095id07p09983
The paper
Rind, D., Goldberg, R., Hansen, J., Rosenzweig, C., & Ruedy, R. (1990). Potential evapotranspiration and the likelihood of future drought. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/jd095id07p09983

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.