The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The second generation regional acid deposition model chemical mechanism for regional air quality modeling
Abstract
A state‐of‐the‐art gas phase chemical mechanism for modeling atmospheric chemistry on a regional scale is presented. The second generation Regional Acid Deposition Model (RADM2) gas phase chemical mechanism, like its predecessor RADM1, is highly nonlinear, since predicted ozone, sulfate, nitric acid and hydrogen peroxide concentrations are complicated functions of NOx and nonmethane hydrocarbon concentrations. The RADM2 chemical mechanism is an upgrade of RADM1 in that (1) three classes of higher alkanes are used instead of one, (2) a more detailed treatment of aromatic chemistry is used, (3) the two higher alkene classes now represent internal and terminal alkenes, (4) ketones and dicarbonyl species are treated as classes distinct from aldehydes, (5) isoprene is now included as an explicit species, and (6) there is a more detailed treatment of peroxy radical‐peroxy radical reactions. As a result of these improvements the RADM2 mechanism simulates the concentrations of peroxyacetyl nitrate, HNO 3, and H 2 O 2 under a wide variety of environmental conditions. Comparisons of RADM2 mechanism with the RADM1 mechanism predictions and selected environmental chamber experimental results indicate that for typical atmospheric conditions, both mechanisms reliably predict O 3, sulfate and nitric acid concentrations. The RADM2 mechanism gives lower and presumably more realistic predictions of H 2 O 2 because of its more detailed treatment of peroxy radical‐peroxy radical reactions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Development of Ozone Reactivity Scales for Volatile Organic Compounds
Carter, W. P. L. (1994) · Air & Waste · doi:10.1080/1073161x.1994.10467290 · Cited by 1,518
Formation of Urban Fine Particulate Matter
Zhang, R., Wang, G., Guo, S., Zamora, M. L., Ying, Q., Lin, Y., Wang, W., Hu, M., & Wang, Y. (2015) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00067 · Cited by 1,426
Fast, J. D., Gustafson, W. I., Easter, R. C., Zaveri, R. A., Barnard, J. C., Chapman, E. G., Grell, G. A., & Peckham, S. E. (2006) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/2005jd006721 · Cited by 1,162
Isoprene Forms Secondary Organic Aerosol through Cloud Processing: Model Simulations
Lim, H.-J., Carlton, A. G., & Turpin, B. J. (2005) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es048039h · Cited by 417
Receptor modeling application framework for particle source apportionment
Watson, J. G., Zhu, T., Chow, J. C., Engelbrecht, J., Fujita, E. M., & Wilson, W. E. (2002) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/s0045-6535(02)00243-6 · Cited by 299
Metadata
- Authors
- Stockwell, W. R., Middleton, P., Chang, J. S., & Tang, X.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1990-09-20
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- D10
- Pages
- 16343-16367
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2036051505
- Cited by
- 1,187
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The second generation regional acid deposition model chemical mechanism for regional air quality modeling. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/jd095id10p16343
- The paper
- Stockwell, W. R., Middleton, P., Chang, J. S., & Tang, X. (1990). The second generation regional acid deposition model chemical mechanism for regional air quality modeling. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/jd095id10p16343
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.