The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Tropospheric OH in a three‐dimensional chemical tracer model: An assessment based on observations of CH3CCl3
Open accessAbstract
The three‐dimensional global distribution of OH over a year is calculated as a function of temperature, ultraviolet irradiance, and densities of H 2 O, CO, O 3, CH 4, and NOt, (defined as NO + NO 2 + NO 3 + 2N 2 O 5 + HNO 2 + HNO 4). The concentration of OH is computed within a chemical tracer model (CTM) with an accuracy comparable to that of a detailed photochemical model. Distributions of CO, NOt, O 3, CH 4, and the density of O 3 column were specified on the basis of observations. Meteorological fields were derived from the general circulation model developed at the Goddard Institute for Space Studies. The numerical method for parametrization of chemistry is described in Spivakovsky et al. (this issue). The CTM is used to simulate the global distribution of CH 3 CCl 3. The computed distribution of OH implies a lifetime of 5.5 years for CH 3 CCl 3 (obtained by relating the global burden of CH 3 CCl 3 to the global loss, integrated using simulated three‐dimensional distributions). Analysis of the long‐term trend in CH 3 CCl 3 as defined by observations suggests a lifetime of 6.2 years (consistent with Prinn et al. (1987)), indicating that model levels of OH may be too high by about 13%. This estimate for the lifetime depends on industry data for global emissions and on the absolute calibration of observations. It is argued that seasonal variations of CH 3 CCl 3 provide an independent test for computed OH fields that is insensitive to the uncertainties in the budget of CH 3 CCl 3. The annual cycle of CH 3 CCl 3 from about 25°S to the South Pole is dominated by seasonal changes in OH. Observed seasonal variations of CH 3 CCl 3 indicate that the OH field south of 20°S±4° should be scaled by 0.75±0.25 from computed values, consistent with the result based on long‐term trends. Reactions involving non‐methane hydrocarbons were not included in the current model. These reactions could account for lower concentrations of OH than computed. Seasonal variations of CH 3 CCl 3 in the tropics and in the northern mid‐latitudes are dominated by effects of transport. If use of CH 3 CCl 3 is phased out (as envisioned by the Montreal protocol), the dynamically driven seasonal variations of CH 3 CCl 3 will decrease dramatically, whereas the chemically driven variations will remain proportional to the concentration of CH 3 CCl 3; then the annual cycle of CH 3 CCl 3 in northern mid‐latitudes will provide a measure of OH as does at present the annual cycle in southern mid‐latitudes. The influence of chemistry on the latitudinal distribution of CH 3 CCl 3 is small and at present does not provide a constraint for the globally averaged OH or for the latitudinal distribution of OH. However, if emissions of CH 3 CCl 3 were to cease, the tropical depression in the concentration of CH 3 CCl 3 caused by high levels of OH in the tropics may provide an additional means to test OH models.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Three‐dimensional model synthesis of the global methane cycle
Fung, I., John, J., Lerner, J., Matthews, E., Prather, M., Steele, L. P., & Fraser, P. J. (1991) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/91jd01247 · Cited by 958
Self-citationThree‐dimensional climatological distribution of tropospheric OH: Update and evaluation
Spivakovsky, C. M., Logan, J. A., Montzka, S. A., Balkanski, Y. J., Foreman‐Fowler, M., Jones, D. B. A., Horowitz, L. W., Fusco, A. C., Brenninkmeijer, C. A. M., Prather, M. J., et al. (2000) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/1999jd901006 · Cited by 910
Self-citationA history of chemically and radiatively important gases in air deduced from ALE/GAGE/AGAGE
Prinn, R. G., Weiss, R. F., Fraser, P. J., Simmonds, P. G., Cunnold, D. M., Alyea, F. N., O'Doherty, S., Salameh, P., Miller, B. R., Huang, J., et al. (2000) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/2000jd900141 · Cited by 721
Tegen, I., Hollrig, P., Chin, M., Fung, I., Jacob, D., & Penner, J. (1997) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/97jd01864 · Cited by 665
An inverse modeling approach to investigate the global atmospheric methane cycle
Hein, R., Crutzen, P. J., & Heimann, M. (1997) · Global Biogeochemical Cycles · doi:10.1029/96gb03043 · Cited by 621
Metadata
- Authors
- Spivakovsky, C. M., Yevich, R., Logan, J. A., Wofsy, S. C., McElroy, M. B., & Prather, M. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1990-10-20
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- D11
- Pages
- 18441-18471
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2053511065
- Cited by
- 226
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Tropospheric OH in a three‐dimensional chemical tracer model: An assessment based on observations of CH3CCl3. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/jd095id11p18441
- The paper
- Spivakovsky, C. M., Yevich, R., Logan, J. A., Wofsy, S. C., McElroy, M. B., & Prather, M. J. (1990). Tropospheric OH in a three‐dimensional chemical tracer model: An assessment based on observations of CH3CCl3. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/jd095id11p18441
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.