Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,684

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Propagation of planetary-scale disturbances from the lower into the upper atmosphere

Charney, J. G., Drazin, P. G.·1961·Journal of Geophysical Research

Abstract

The possibility that a significant part of the energy of the planetary-wave disturbances of the troposphere may propagate into the upper atmosphere is investigated. The propagation is analogous to the transmission of electromagnetic radiation in heterogeneous media. It is found that the effective index of refraction for the planetary waves depends primarily on the distribution of the mean zonal wind with height. Energy is trapped (reflected) in regions where the zonal winds are easterly or are large and westerly. As a consequence, the summer circumpolar anticyclone and the winter circumpolar cyclone in the upper stratosphere and mesosphere are little influenced by lower atmosphere motions. Energy may escape into the mesosphere near the equinoxes, when the upper-atmosphere zonal flow reverses. At these times tunneling of the energy through a reflecting barrier is also possible. Most of the time, however, there appears to be little mechanical coupling on a planetary scale between the upper and lower atmospheres. Tropospheric sources of wave disturbances in the zonal flow are baroclinic instability and the forcing action of zonally asymmetric heating and topography. The transmissivity of the upper atmosphere increases with wavelength and is greater for the forced perturbations than for the unstable tropospheric waves, whose lengths must be smaller than the critical length for instability. The analysis indicates that baroclinically unstable wave disturbances originating in the troposphere probably do not propagate energy vertically at all. When energy is propagated to great heights, nonlinear vertical eddy transports of heat and momentum associated with the vertically propagating waves should modify the basic zonal flow. However, when the wave disturbance is a small stationary perturbation on a zonal flow that varies vertically but not horizontally, the second-order effect of the eddies on the zonal flow is zero.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/jz066i001p00083

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. Burger, 1958, Scale considerations of plmaetary motions of the atmosphere, Tellus, 10, 195, 10.1111/j.2153-3490.1958.tb02005.x · DOI
  2. Charney, 1947, The dynamics of long waves in a baroclinic westerly current, J. Meteorol., 4, 135, 10.1175/1520-0469(1947)004<0136:TDOLWI>2.0.CO;2 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Charney, 1949, On a physical basis for numerical prediction of large-scale motions in the atmosphere, J. Meteorol., 6, 371, 10.1175/1520-0469(1949)006<0372:OAPBFN>2.0.CO;2 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Charney, 1949, A numerical method for predicting the perturbations of the middle latitude westerlies, Tellus, 1, 38, 10.1111/j.2153-3490.1949.tb01258.x · doi:10.1111/j.2153-3490.1949.tb01258.x
  5. Eady, 1949, Long waves and cyclone waves, Tellus, 1, 33, 10.1111/j.2153-3490.1949.tb01265.x · DOI · Paper page
  6. Eckart, 1930, The perturbation of a potential barrier by electrons, Phys. Rev., [2], 35, 1303, 10.1103/PhysRev.35.1303 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Eckart, 1960, Hydrodynamics of Oceans and Atmospheres
  8. Gambo, 1950, The criteria for stability of the westerlies, Collected Meteorol. Papers, Tokyo, 2
  9. Hines, 1959, An interpretation of certain ionospheric motions in terms of atmospheric waves, J. Geophys. Research, 64, 2210, 10.1029/JZ064i012p02210 · doi:10.1029/jz064i012p02210
  10. Kochanski, 1955, Cross sections of the mean zonal flow and temperature along 80°W, J. Meteorol., 12, 95, 10.1175/1520-0469(1955)012<0095:CSOTMZ>2.0.CO;2 · doi:10.1175/1520-0469(1955)012<0095:csotmz>2.0.co;2
  11. 1953, The Sun
  12. Kuo, 1952, Three-dimensional disturbances in a baroclinic zonal current, J. Meteorol., 4, 260, 10.1175/1520-0469(1952)009<0260:TDDIAB>2.0.CO;2 · doi:10.1175/1520-0469(1952)009<0260:tddiab>2.0.co;2
  13. Lin, 1955, The Theory of Hydrodynamic Stability
  14. Murgatroyd, 1957, Winds and temperatures between 20 km and 100 km-a review, Quart. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 83, 417, 10.1002/qj.49708335802 · doi:10.1002/qj.49708335802
  15. Murray, 1960, Dynamic stability in the stratosphere, J. Geophys. Research, 65, 3273, 10.1029/JZ065i010p03273 · doi:10.1029/jz065i010p03273
  16. Saltzman, 1958, Some hemispheric spectral statistics, J. Meteorol., 15, 259, 10.1175/1520-0469(1958)015<0259:SHSS>2.0.CO;2 · doi:10.1175/1520-0469(1958)015<0259:shss>2.0.co;2
  17. Smagorinsky, 1953, The dynamical influence of large-scale heat sources and sinks on the quasi-stationary mean motions of the atmosphere, Quart. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 79, 342, 10.1002/qj.49707934103 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 1,684

Metadata

Authors
Charney, J. G., & Drazin, P. G.
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research
Published
1961-01
Volume
66
Issue
1
Pages
83-109
ISSN
0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2054650627
Cited by
1,684
References
1
FWCI
7.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1 (tdm, 19966 d)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Propagation of planetary-scale disturbances from the lower into the upper atmosphere. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/jz066i001p00083
The paper
Charney, J. G., & Drazin, P. G. (1961). Propagation of planetary-scale disturbances from the lower into the upper atmosphere. Journal of Geophysical Research. https://doi.org/10.1029/jz066i001p00083

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.