The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Moisture and energy conditions within a sloping soil mass during drainage
Abstract
In an effort to explain the source of nonstorm streamflow in deep-soiled areas of the southern Appalachians, a 3×3× 45-foot inclining concrete trough was constructed on a 40 per cent slope. The structure was packed with a natural sandy-loam soil to a bulk density of 1.3, and after thorough soaking was covered with plastic to prevent evaporation. Outflow was measured at the base, and soil moisture tension and content were recorded for 145 days. As shown by piezometers, the larger pores were substantially emptied in 1.5 days, during which outflow occurred according to the expression, Q = a1T−b1 where T is time in days since day zero and a1 and b1 are constants. After a 5-day transition period, the logarithm of drainage for the next 80 days was again linearly related to the logarithm of time, but with new constants,a2 and b2, expressing unsaturated flow from the entire soil mass. An additional 60 days of flow occurred, deviating more and more from the log-log relation as the limits of drainage were approached. Soil moisture content and tension substantiated the theory that the entire unsaturated soil mass was contributing to outflow throughout the experiment. It is concluded that unsaturated flow in the earth mantle of steep watersheds cannot be ignored in hydrograph analysis, since it may well be a primary mechanism for sustaining baseflow.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Macropores and water flow in soils
Beven, K., & Germann, P. (1982) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1029/wr018i005p01311 · Cited by 2,679
A decade of Predictions in Ungauged Basins (PUB)—a review
Hrachowitz, M., Savenije, H. H. G., Blöschl, G., McDonnell, J. J., Sivapalan, M., Pomeroy, J. W., Arheimer, B., Blume, T., Clark, M. P., Ehret, U., et al. (2013) · Hydrological Sciences Journal · doi:10.1080/02626667.2013.803183 · Cited by 1,295
Soil Moisture Measurement for Ecological and Hydrological Watershed‐Scale Observatories: A Review
Robinson, D. A., Campbell, C. S., Hopmans, J. W., Hornbuckle, B. K., Jones, S. B., Knight, R., Ogden, F., Selker, J., & Wendroth, O. (2008) · Vadose Zone Journal · doi:10.2136/vzj2007.0143 · Cited by 1,154
Partial Area Contributions to Storm Runoff in a Small New England Watershed
Dunne, T., & Black, R. D. (1970) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1029/wr006i005p01296 · Cited by 1,152
The in(a/tan/β) index: How to calculate it and how to use it within the topmodel framework
Quinn, P. F., Beven, K. J., & Lamb, R. (1995) · Hydrological Processes · doi:10.1002/hyp.3360090204 · Cited by 532
Metadata
- Authors
- Hewlett, J. D., & Hibbert, A. R.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1963-02-15
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1081-1087
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2078317835
- Cited by
- 354
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Moisture and energy conditions within a sloping soil mass during drainage. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/jz068i004p01081
- The paper
- Hewlett, J. D., & Hibbert, A. R. (1963). Moisture and energy conditions within a sloping soil mass during drainage. Journal of Geophysical Research. https://doi.org/10.1029/jz068i004p01081
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.