Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 447

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Phase transitions and mantle discontinuities

Jeanloz, Raymond, Thompson, Alan B.·1983·Reviews of Geophysics

Abstract

Density and elasticity data are consistent with, but do not require, a uniform upper‐ and lower‐mantle composition. Such data cannot at present resolve the small changes in physical properties that would be required to keep distinct mantle reservoirs dynamically separated. Alternatively, the issue of chemical stratification in the mantle can be addressed by analyzing the details of the phase equilibria of the appropriate minerals. In order to do this we construct an internally consistent pressure calibration scale which is based in part on the coesite‐stishovite transition pressure P tr(GPa) = 7.45(±0.3) + 2.1(±0.3) × 10−3T(°C) according to our reanalysis of the available data. We conclude that a discontinuous reaction occurs in the olivine component (α+γ = α+β) of the mantle at the conditions of the 400‐km seismological discontinuity; however, no discontinuous reactions corresponding to the 670‐km discontinuity have yet been identified. The only reaction observed in diamond cell experiments at approximately the pressures existing at 670‐km depth, the breakdown of γ‐spinel to form a silicate perovskite assemblage, appears not to satisfy the observed sharpness of this discontinuity. Thus it may be necessary to invoke either a univariant reaction that has not yet been observed experimentally or a chemical discontinuity at this depth. As the mantle is likely to be at temperatures higher than those of the experiments (estimated to be near 1000°C), additional univariant reactions involving the silicate ilmenite or garnet phases that are predicted to occur may be significant. One possible interpretation is that the mantle is of uniform composition and that such (hypothetical) reactions produce the 670‐km discontinuity. This would imply that the phase assemblages so far studied in high‐pressure‐temperature experiments are not those occurring in the mantle. Alternatively, the mantle could be chemically stratified.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/rg021i001p00051

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 447

Metadata

Authors
Jeanloz, R., & Thompson, A. B.
Venue
Reviews of Geophysics
Published
1983-02
Volume
21
Issue
1
Pages
51-74
ISSN
  • 0096-1043 (ISSN-L)
  • 8755-1209
  • 1944-9208
OpenAlex
W2120955891
Cited by
447
References
0
FWCI
19.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phase transitions and mantle discontinuities. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/rg021i001p00051
The paper
Jeanloz, R., & Thompson, A. B. (1983). Phase transitions and mantle discontinuities. Reviews of Geophysics. https://doi.org/10.1029/rg021i001p00051

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.