The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A review of distributed parameter groundwater management modeling methods
Abstract
Models which solve the governing groundwater flow or solute transport equations in conjunction with optimization techniques, such as linear and quadratic programing, are powerful aquifer management tools. Groundwater management models fall in two general categories: hydraulics or policy evaluation and water allocation. Groundwater hydraulic management models enable the determination of optimal locations and pumping rates of numerous wells under a variety of restrictions placed upon local drawdown, hydraulic gradients, and water production targets. Groundwater policy evaluation and allocation models can be used to study the influence upon regional groundwater use of institutional policies such as taxes and quotas. Furthermore, fairly complex groundwater‐surface water allocation problems can be handled using system decomposition and multilevel optimization. Experience from the few real world applications of groundwater optimization‐management techniques is summarized. Classified separately are methods for groundwater quality management aimed at optimal waste disposal in the subsurface. This classification is composed of steady state and transient management models that determine disposal patterns in such a way that water quality is protected at supply locations. Classes of research missing from the literature are groundwater quality management models involving nonlinear constraints, models which join groundwater hydraulic and quality simulations with political‐economic management considerations, and management models that include parameter uncertainty.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Dynamics of Fluids in Porous Media
Bear, J. (1975) · Soil Science · doi:10.1097/00010694-197508000-00022 · Cited by 9,778
Raats, P. A. C. (1973) · Soil Science Society of America Journal · doi:10.2136/sssaj1973.03615995003700040004x · Cited by 3,415
Introduction to Operations Research
Leimkuhler, F. F. (1968) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1968.10490578 · Cited by 3,405
Theis, C. V. (1935) · Transactions American Geophysical Union · doi:10.1029/tr016i002p00519 · Cited by 3,223
(1980) · Advances in Water Resources · doi:10.1016/0309-1708(80)90068-8 · Cited by 3,037
Introduction to Matrix Analysis
Bellman, R. (1960) · Cited by 2,973
Introduction to matrix analysis
Amar, H. (1960) · Journal of the Franklin Institute · doi:10.1016/0016-0032(60)90904-2 · Cited by 2,316
Principles of Operations Research.
Rivett, P., & Wagner, H. M. (1970) · Operational Research Quarterly (1970-1977) · doi:10.2307/3008431 · Cited by 876
Principles of Operations Research.
Rivett, P. (1970) · Journal of the Operational Research Society · doi:10.1057/jors.1970.103 · Cited by 348
Application of the Digital Computer for Aquifer Evaluation
Pinder, G. F., & Bredehoeft, J. D. (1968) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1029/wr004i005p01069 · Cited by 300
Cited by
Physically based modeling in catchment hydrology at 50: Survey and outlook
Paniconi, C., & Putti, M. (2015) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1002/2015wr017780 · Cited by 374
Yan, Y., Lidberg, W., Tenenbaum, D. E., & Pilesjö, P. (2020) · Hydrological Processes · doi:10.1002/hyp.13963 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Gorelick, S. M.
- Venue
- Water Resources Research
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1983-04
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 305-319
- ISSN
- 0043-1397 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-7973
- OpenAlex
- W2056457340
- Cited by
- 490
- References
- 15
- FWCI
- 46.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A review of distributed parameter groundwater management modeling methods. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/wr019i002p00305
- The paper
- Gorelick, S. M. (1983). A review of distributed parameter groundwater management modeling methods. Water Resources Research. https://doi.org/10.1029/wr019i002p00305
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.