CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 17

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The accuracy of drainage network delineation as a function of environmental factors: A case study in Central and Northern Sweden

Yan, Yanzi, Lidberg, William, Tenenbaum, David E., Pilesjö, Petter·2020·Hydrological Processes
DOI 10.1002/hyp.13963
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Drainage networks delineated from Digital Elevation Models (DEMs), are the basis for the modelling of geomorphological and hydrological processes, biogeochemical cycling, and water resources management. Besides providing effective models of water flows, automatically extracted drainage networks based on topography can diverge from reality to varying degrees. The variability of such disagreement within catchments has rarely been examined as a function of the heterogeneity of land cover, soil type, and slope in the catchment of interest. This research gap might not only substantially limit our knowledge of the uncertainty of hydrological prediction, but can also cause problems for users attempting to use the data at a local scale. Using 1:100000 scale land cover maps, Quaternary deposits maps, and 2 m resolution DEMs, it is found that the accuracy of delineated drainage networks tends to be lower in areas with denser vegetation, lower hydraulic conductivity, and higher erodibility. The findings of this study could serve as a guide for the more thoughtful usage of delineated drainage networks in environmental planning, and in the uncertainty analysis of hydrological and biochemical predictions. Therefore, this study makes a first attempt at filling the knowledge gap described above.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hyp.13963

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 78

  1. 10.1111/0031-868X.00195 · DOI
  2. 10.5194/bg-11-1199-2014 · DOI
  3. 10.3390/f6092982 · DOI
  4. 10.3133/pp964 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/j.geomorph.2015.03.040 · DOI
  6. 10.1559/152304005775194692 · DOI
  7. Bear J., 1972, Dynamics of fluids in porous media
  8. 10.1016/0309-1708(93)90028-E · DOI
  9. Bhattacharya A., 2006, Land drainage: Principles, methods and applications
  10. Bjoernbom S., 1985, Description to the Quaternary map Strängnäs NO
  11. 10.1080/10106048609354060 · DOI
  12. Caetano M., 2009, CORINE land cover 2006 for continental Portugal
  13. 10.13031/2013.31890 · DOI
  14. 10.1098/rspa.1950.0068 · DOI
  15. 10.1007/s11258-006-9200-x · DOI
  16. 10.1016/j.advwatres.2008.06.005 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/j.cageo.2016.04.003 · DOI
  18. 10.1080/02693799608902081 · DOI
  19. 10.1130/0091-7613(1992)020<0675:ETALSM>2.3.CO;2 · DOI
  20. Ebdon D., 1991, Statistics in geography: A practical approach‐revised with 17 programs
  21. 10.1073/pnas.1712381114 · DOI
  22. 10.1175/1520-0477(2001)082<2797:MRWUIH>2.3.CO;2 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/j.apgeog.2009.07.003 · DOI
  24. Fischer G., 2002, Global agro‐ecological assessment for agriculture in the 21st century: Methodology and results (Research Report RR‐02‐02)
  25. 10.1016/0098-3004(91)90048-I · DOI
  26. 10.1029/WR019i002p00305 · DOI
  27. Hodgson J., 1974, Soil survey field handbook
  28. 10.14358/PERS.71.7.817 · DOI
  29. 10.1016/S0034-4257(02)00114-1 · DOI
  30. 10.1002/hyp.3360080405 · DOI
  31. 10.1029/TR013i001p00350 · DOI
  32. 10.1016/0022-1694(89)90073-5 · DOI
  33. John W., 2000, Terrain analysis: Principles and applications
  34. Jardim A. C.(2017).Flow directions from digital elevation model: A methodology focused on the quality of estimation and processing of large data. (Dotoral dissertation) Brazil.
  35. Jenson S. K., 1988, Extracting topographic structure from digital elevation data for geographic information system analysis, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 54, 1593
  36. Johnston D. &Timlin D.(2000).Spatial data accuracy and quality assessment for environmental management. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Spatial Accuracy Assessment in Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences.
  37. Jolly J. P.(1982).A proposed method for accurately calculating sediment yields from reservoir deposition volumes. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Exeter Symposium IAHS Publ.
  38. 10.11118/actaun201563041121 · DOI
  39. 10.1016/S0924-2716(98)00009-4 · DOI
  40. 10.1002/hyp.5911 · DOI
  41. 10.1002/hyp.5835 · DOI
  42. 10.1016/S0098-3004(99)00018-7 · DOI
  43. Molle F. Wester P. Hirsch P. Jensen J. R. Murray‐Rust H. Paranjpye V. …Van der Zaag P. (2007).River basin development and management. Retrieved fromD. Molden (Ed.) Water for Food Water for Life: A Comprehensive Assessment of Water Management in Agriculture Earthscan London pp. 585‐625.
  44. 10.1126/science.255.5046.826 · DOI
  45. 10.1016/S0734-189X(84)80011-0 · DOI
  46. 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9837(199702)22:2<107::AID-ESP680>3.0.CO;2-U · DOI
  47. 10.3390/ijgi7060201 · DOI
  48. 10.1029/TR037i001p00043 · DOI
  49. 10.1016/0146-664X(75)90005-2 · DOI
  50. 10.1111/tgis.12015 · DOI
  51. 10.1002/hyp.7582 · DOI
  52. 10.1029/96WR00713 · DOI
  53. 10.1002/hyp.3360050106 · DOI
  54. 10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.06.007 · DOI
  55. 10.1109/LGRS.2011.2163812 · DOI
  56. 10.5194/hess-15-1387-2011 · DOI
  57. 10.1029/TR038i006p00913 · DOI
  58. 10.1080/02626667.2011.637497 · DOI
  59. 10.1007/BF02837966 · DOI
  60. 10.1029/96WR03137 · DOI · Paper page
  61. 10.1007/s11442-011-0901-2 · DOI
  62. 10.5194/hess-14-1527-2010 · DOI · Paper page
  63. 10.1016/0022-1694(92)90206-B · DOI
  64. 10.1016/S0022-1694(00)00342-5 · DOI
  65. 10.1097/00010694-193109000-00003 · DOI
  66. 10.1046/j.1365-2389.2000.00275.x · DOI
  67. 10.1016/S0169-555X(02)00319-7 · DOI
  68. 10.1007/978-3-642-32618-9_24 · DOI
  69. Wilson J. P., 2000, Principles and applications
  70. 10.1029/TR039i002p00285 · DOI
  71. 10.4324/9780203481554 · DOI
  72. 10.1016/j.geomorph.2019.04.022 · DOI
  73. 10.1002/hyp.9719 · DOI
  74. 10.1007/s11430-016-0211-5 · DOI
  75. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.02.045 · DOI
  76. 10.1002/hyp.11479 · DOI
  77. Young R., 2004, Freshwaters of New Zealand, 37.31
  78. 10.1029/2010WR009961 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 17

Metadata

Authors
Yan, Y., Lidberg, W., Tenenbaum, D. E., & Pilesjö, P.
Affiliations
  • Department of Physical Geography and Ecosystem Science Lund University Lund Sweden
  • Department of Forest Ecology and management Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Umeå Sweden
ORCID
Venue
Hydrological Processes
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-11-12
Volume
34
Issue
26
Pages
5489-5504
ISSN
  • 0885-6087
  • 1099-1085
DOI
10.1002/hyp.13963
Cited by
17
References
0
Language
en
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (vor)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review