The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A method of streamflow drought analysis
Abstract
A method of completely describing and analyzing the stochastic process of streamflow droughts has been recommended. All important components of streamflow droughts such as deficit, duration, time of occurrence, number of streamflow droughts in a given time interval [0, t], the largest streamflow drought deficit, and the largest streamflow drought duration in a given time interval [0, t] are taken into consideration. A streamflow drought is related here to streamflow deficit. Following the theory of the supremum of a random number of random variables a stochastic model is presented for interpretation and analysis of the largest streamflow drought deficit below a given reference discharge and the largest streamflow drought duration concerning a time interval [0, t], at a given location of a river. The method is based on the assumption that streamflow droughts are independent, identically distributed random variables and that their occurrence is subject to the Poisson probability law. This paper is actually a continuation of the previous E. Zelenhasić (1970, 1979, 1983) and P. Todorović (1970) works on the extremes in hydrology. Application of the method is made on the 58‐year record of the Sava River at Sr. Mitrovica and on the 52‐year record of Tisa River at Senta, Yugoslavia, and good agreement is found between the theoretical and empirical distribution functions for all analyzed drought components for both rivers. Only one complete example, the Sava River at Sr. Mitrovica, is given in the paper. The proposed method deals with hydrograph recessions of daily or instantaneous discharges in the region of low flows, and not with mean annual flows which were used by other investigators.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Assessment of Hydrological Drought Revisited
Nalbantis, I., & Tsakiris, G. (2009) · Water Resources Management · doi:10.1007/s11269-008-9305-1 · Cited by 914
Measuring the Dunkelflaute: how (not) to analyze variable renewable energy shortage
Kittel, M., & Schill, W.-P. (2024) · Environmental Research: Energy · doi:10.1088/2753-3751/ad6dfc · Cited by 37
Yaeger, M. A., Sivapalan, M., McIsaac, G. F., & Cai, X. (2013) · Hydrology and Earth System Sciences · doi:10.5194/hess-17-4607-2013 · Cited by 23
“…method was chosen to determine streamflow droughts (Yevjevich, 1967; Zelenhasi ć and Salvai, 1987); at each gauge the area-averaged streamflow (water yield) corresponding to both the 90th and 95th percentiles on the flow duration curve was used as the threshold (Zelenhasi ć and Salvai, 1987).”
Influential
Metadata
- Authors
- Zelenhasić, E., & Salvai, A.
- Venue
- Water Resources Research
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1987-01
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 156-168
- ISSN
- 0043-1397 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-7973
- OpenAlex
- W2002993215
- Cited by
- 327
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A method of streamflow drought analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/wr023i001p00156
- The paper
- Zelenhasić, E., & Salvai, A. (1987). A method of streamflow drought analysis. Water Resources Research. https://doi.org/10.1029/wr023i001p00156
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.