The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Differential response of antioxidant compounds to salinity stress in salt‐tolerant and salt‐sensitive seedlings of foxtail millet (Setaria italica)
Abstract
The modulation of antioxidant components was comparatively analysed in a salt‐tolerant (cv. Prasad) and salt‐sensitive (cv. Lepakshi) cultivar of foxtail millet (Setaria italica L.) under different NaCl concentrations. Under conditions of salt stress, the salt‐tolerant cultivar exhibited increased total superoxide dismutase (SOD) and ascorbate peroxidase (APX) activity, whereas both enzyme activities decreased in acutely salt‐stressed seedlings of the sensitive cultivar. At 200 m M NaCl, the tolerant foxtail millet cultivar responded with induction of cytosolic Cu/Zn‐SOD and the Mn‐SOD isoform at the protein level. The induced accumulation of the cytosolic Cu/Zn‐SOD protein/activity is positively correlated with an elevated level of the cytosolic APX gene activity. The elevated cytosolic Cu/Zn‐SOD and cytosolic APX activity correlates with an induced accumulation of their transcripts. Tolerant 5‐day‐old seedlings grown during high salinity treatment (200 m M NaCl) contained a lower amount of Na+ ions and showed a lower electrolyte leakage than sensitive seedlings. In conclusion, our comparative studies indicate that salt‐induced oxidative tolerance is conferred by an enhanced compartment‐specific activity of the antioxidant enzymes in response to compartment‐specific signals.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Superoxide dismutase: Improved assays and an assay applicable to acrylamide gels
Beauchamp, C., & Fridovich, I. (1971) · Analytical Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/0003-2697(71)90370-8 · Cited by 12,892
Hydrogen Peroxide is Scavenged by Ascorbate-specific Peroxidase in Spinach Chloroplasts
Nakano, Y., & Asada, K. (1981) · Plant and Cell Physiology · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.pcp.a076232 · Cited by 10,809
Cited by
Salt tolerance and salinity effects on plants: a review
Parida, A. K., & Das, A. B. (2005) · Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2004.06.010 · Cited by 4,160
Elucidating the molecular mechanisms mediating plant salt‐stress responses
Yang, Y., & Guo, Y. (2018) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.14920 · Cited by 1,631
Parida, A. K., Das, A. B., & Mohanty, P. (2004) · Journal of Plant Physiology · doi:10.1078/0176-1617-01084 · Cited by 340
Antioxidant defense mechanism under salt stress in wheat seedlings
Mandhania, S., Madan, S., & Sawhney, V. (2006) · Biologia plantarum · doi:10.1007/s10535-006-0011-7 · Cited by 261
Raza, S. H., Athar, H. R., Ashraf, M., & Hameed, A. (2007) · Environmental and Experimental Botany · doi:10.1016/j.envexpbot.2006.12.009 · Cited by 219
Metadata
- Authors
- Sreenivasulu, N., Grimm, B., Wobus, U., & Weschke, W.
- Venue
- Physiologia Plantarum
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2000-08
- Volume
- 109
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 435-442
- ISSN
- 0031-9317 (ISSN-L)
- 1399-3054
- OpenAlex
- W2056262403
- Cited by
- 369
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Differential response of antioxidant compounds to salinity stress in salt‐tolerant and salt‐sensitive seedlings of foxtail millet (Setaria italica). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1034/j.1399-3054.2000.100410.x
- The paper
- Sreenivasulu, N., Grimm, B., Wobus, U., & Weschke, W. (2000). Differential response of antioxidant compounds to salinity stress in salt‐tolerant and salt‐sensitive seedlings of foxtail millet (Setaria italica). Physiologia Plantarum. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1399-3054.2000.100410.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.