The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Synergistic interactions between volicitin, jasmonic acid and ethylene mediate insect‐induced volatile emission in Zea mays
Abstract
Plants display differential responses following mechanical damage and insect herbivory. Both caterpillar attack and the application of caterpillar oral secretions (OS) to wounded leaves stimulates volatile emission above mechanical damage alone. Volicitin (N‐17‐hydroxylinolenoyl‐l‐glutamine), present in beet armyworm (BAW, Spodoptera exigua) OS, is a powerful elicitor of volatiles in excised maize seedlings (Zea mays cv. Delprim). We consider some of the mechanistic differences between wounding and insect herbivory in maize by examining the activity of volicitin, changes in jasmonic acid (JA) levels, and volatile emission from both intact plant and excised leaf bioassays. Compared to mechanical damage alone, volicitin stimulated increases in both JA levels and sesquiterpene volatiles when applied to intact plants. In a bioassay comparison, excised leaves were more sensitive and produced far greater volatile responses than intact plants following applications of both volicitin and JA. In the excised leaf bioassay, volicitin applications (10–500 pmol) to wounded leaves resulted in dose dependent JA increases and a direct positive relationship between JA and sesquiterpene volatile emission. Interestingly, volicitin‐induced JA levels did not differ between intact and excised bioassays, suggesting a possible interaction of JA with other regulatory signals in excised plants. In addition to JA, insect herbivory is known to stimulate the production of ethylene. Significant increases in ethylene were induced only by BAW herbivory and not by either wounding or volicitin treatments. Using intact plant bioassays, ethylene (at 1 µl l−1 or less) greatly promoted volatile emission induced by volicitin and JA but not mechanical damage alone. For intact plants, wounding, elicitor‐induced JA and insect‐induced ethylene appear to be important interacting components in the stimulation of insect‐induced volatile emission.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Indole is an essential herbivore-induced volatile priming signal in maize
Erb, M., Veyrat, N., Robert, C. A. M., Xu, H., Frey, M., Ton, J., & Turlings, T. C. J. (2015) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms7273 · Cited by 467
Halitschke, R., & Baldwin, I. T. (2003) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1046/j.1365-313x.2003.01921.x · Cited by 346
Hemipterans as Plant Pathogens
Kaloshian, I., & Walling, L. L. (2005) · Annual Review of Phytopathology · doi:10.1146/annurev.phyto.43.040204.135944 · Cited by 264
MARTI, G., ERB, M., BOCCARD, J., GLAUSER, G., DOYEN, G. R., VILLARD, N., ROBERT, C. A. M., TURLINGS, T. C. J., RUDAZ, S., & WOLFENDER, J. (2013) · Plant, Cell & Environment · doi:10.1111/pce.12002 · Cited by 183
Metadata
- Authors
- Schmelz, E. A., Alborn, H. T., & Tumlinson, J. H.
- Venue
- Physiologia Plantarum
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-02-28
- Volume
- 117
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 403-412
- ISSN
- 0031-9317 (ISSN-L)
- 1399-3054
- OpenAlex
- W2148070324
- Cited by
- 158
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 19.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Synergistic interactions between volicitin, jasmonic acid and ethylene mediate insect‐induced volatile emission in Zea mays. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1034/j.1399-3054.2003.00054.x
- The paper
- Schmelz, E. A., Alborn, H. T., & Tumlinson, J. H. (2003). Synergistic interactions between volicitin, jasmonic acid and ethylene mediate insect‐induced volatile emission in Zea mays. Physiologia Plantarum. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1399-3054.2003.00054.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.