The DOI matches its Crossref record; 127 of the 127 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Hemipterans as Plant Pathogens
Abstract
Integration of the tools of genetics, genomics, and biochemistry has provided new approaches for identifying genes responding to herbivory. As a result, a picture of the complexity of plant-defense signaling to different herbivore feeding guilds is emerging. Plant responses to hemipteran insects have substantial overlap with responses mounted against microbial pathogens, as seen in changes in RNA profiles and emission of volatiles. Responses to known defense signals and characterization of the signaling pathways controlled by the first cloned insect R gene (Mi-1) indicate that perception and signal transduction leading to resistance may be similar to plant-pathogen interactions. Additionally, novel signaling pathways are emerging as important components of plant defense to insects. The availability of new tools and approaches will further enhance our understanding of the nature of defense in plant-hemipteran interactions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Plant pathogens and integrated defence responses to infection
Dangl, J. L., & Jones, J. D. G. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35081161 · Cited by 3,949
Feussner, I., & Wasternack, C. (2002) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.53.100301.135248 · Cited by 1,508
P LANT R ESPONSES TO I NSECT H ERBIVORY: The Emerging Molecular Analysis
Kessler, A., & Baldwin, I. T. (2002) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.53.100301.135207 · Cited by 1,482
The Myriad Plant Responses to Herbivores
Walling, L. L. (2000) · Journal of Plant Growth Regulation · doi:10.1007/s003440000026 · Cited by 1,386
Self-citationBacterial Volatiles Induce Systemic Resistance in Arabidopsis
Ryu, C.-M., Farag, M. A., Hu, C.-H., Reddy, M. S., Kloepper, J. W., & Paré, P. W. (2004) · PLANT PHYSIOLOGY · doi:10.1104/pp.103.026583 · Cited by 1,308
Differential Gene Expression in Response to Mechanical Wounding and Insect Feeding in Arabidopsis
Reymond, P., Weber, H., Damond, M., & Farmer, E. E. (2000) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.12.5.707 · Cited by 1,227
Mackey, D., Holt, B. F., Wiig, A., & Dangl, J. L. (2002) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(02)00661-x · Cited by 1,200
Plant Volatiles as a Defense against Insect Herbivores
Paré, P. W., & Tumlinson, J. H. (1999) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.121.2.325 · Cited by 1,196
Staswick, P. E., & Tiryaki, I. (2004) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.104.023549 · Cited by 1,112
Mackey, D., Belkhadir, Y., Alonso, J. M., Ecker, J. R., & Dangl, J. L. (2003) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(03)00040-0 · Cited by 982
Cited by
Avoiding Effective Defenses: Strategies Employed by Phloem-Feeding Insects
Walling, L. L. (2008) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.107.113142 · Cited by 616
Self-citationReactive Oxygen Species in Plant Interactions With Aphids
Goggin, F. L., & Fischer, H. D. (2022) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2021.811105 · Cited by 55
Metadata
- Authors
- Kaloshian, I., & Walling, L. L.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Phytopathology
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2005-09-01
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 491-521
- ISSN
- 0066-4286 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-2107
- OpenAlex
- W2112993388
- Cited by
- 264
- References
- 127
- FWCI
- 1.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hemipterans as Plant Pathogens. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.phyto.43.040204.135944
- The paper
- Kaloshian, I., & Walling, L. L. (2005). Hemipterans as Plant Pathogens. Annual Review of Phytopathology. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.phyto.43.040204.135944
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
