Cited by 36Healthcare Decision-Making and RestraintsPsychiatric care and mental health servicesHealth, Medicine and Society

Sources of coercive behaviours in psychiatric admissions

Lidz, C. W., Mulvey, E. P., Hoge, S. K., Kirsch, B. L., Monahan, J., Bennett, N. S., Eisenberg, M., Gardner, W. +1 more·2000·Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Coercion during psychiatric admissions has been a topic of debate for many years. Although there has been considerable research on patients' perceptions of coercion, there has been no work on who places pressures on patients to be admitted. METHOD: This article integrates interview data from interviews with patients, admitting staff and family and friends to describe the pressures brought to bear on patients to be admitted. RESULTS: Health-care professionals appear to be the most important source of pressures on patients, and to have the most impact on patients' perceptions of coercion. However, there are differences in type of pressure, and the pressures used by family and friends appear to have the most longstanding impact. CONCLUSION: Legal and clinical efforts to reduce the level of coercive pressures on patients need to recognize the importance of mental-health professionals, including especially those who are not legally mandated to participate in the admission process.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1034/j.1600-0447.2000.101001073.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Many studies have found a positive association between perceived coercion and the use of threats, leverage, or displays of force.

    “Many studies have found a positive association between perceived coercion and the use of threats, leverage, or displays of force [41,45,47,48,65,85,162].”
  • Although each professional's approach does influence how care is perceived and the extent to which it is experienced as coercive, the literature also highlights that healthcare workers are trapped within systems that prevent them from intervening in ways that align with their professional values.

    “Although each professional’s approach does influence how care is perceived and the extent to which it is experienced as coercive [47,83,153], the literature also highlights that healthcare workers are trapped within systems that prevent them from intervening in ways that align with their professional values, which are centered on supporting, not controlling, the person [181,182,183].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lidz, C. W., Mulvey, E. P., Hoge, S. K., Kirsch, B. L., Monahan, J., Bennett, N. S., Eisenberg, M., Gardner, W., & Roth, L. H.
Affiliations
  • University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • University of Virginia (US)
Corresponding author
Lidz, C. W.
Venue
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2000-01
Volume
101
Issue
1
Pages
73-79
ISSN
  • 0001-690X (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-0447
OpenAlex
W2151993468
Cited by
36
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health, Medicine and Society
Keywords
psychiatric hospital admissions, involuntary admission, healthcare workers, family and friends, mental health professionals
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Attitude of Health Personnel, Attitude to Health, Mental Disorders, Coercion, Family, Follow-Up Studies, Forensic Psychiatry, Hospitals, Psychiatric, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Middle Aged, Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale, Patient Admission, Patient Advocacy, Pennsylvania, Personnel, Hospital, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Tape Recording, Virginia, Police

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review